Re: Images shot on X-ray film
And here is one with 30m(inutes :P) m same dilution and process. I think i am sticking with 30m for now, moving up from 12. General feeling is better.
https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3932/...719366c3_c.jpgScan-141002-0003www by Sergei Rodionov, on Flickr
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
Very nice. Scene gives me ideas. Process also interesting.
Thanks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SergeiR
Decided to dork around with development time again. For my normal quantities it looks like around 7 minutes rotary will give you somewhat clear pour out developer. After 7 it starts to break down and it becomes blueish gray .. So i figured - what the hell. Lets go back a bit to even longer periods (i used to do up to 1hr with Arista film in similar dillutions).
Here is 35m rotary with 1:225 dilution pf Adonal (i had to run to the shop, to pick up bread for kid ;))
Very very delicate tones in highlights. I thought i blew them up , judging negative alone, but proven to be wrong. (oh come on.. 15s exposure that i counted in missisipies ;)) So i think i am going to be back to longer times for scenes with higher range.
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Randy Moe
Very nice. Scene gives me ideas. Process also interesting.
Thanks
Yeah, i got this doll for some collodion series, but ended up never starting it (was too hot here for 2 last months) :) Now that it cooling down i can start after all
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
Oh and after 30-35 minutes developer looks like REALLY dirty water ;) and, what is interesting, fixer doesn't become as yellowish as with 12 minutes or less.
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
The very first test picture, it's not bad, but in the future some little problem i will hope be solved.
Film: XOE Retina (iso400), Rodinal 1+50, dev.: 7sec, in tank, rotated with my hand.
Attachment 122760
Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.
I wonder if anyone has any idea why xray films clear so quickly in the fix? Given their extra density, that's the last thing I would expect.
They also seem to dry quickly.
Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.
As a semi-educated guess, the double emulsion films use a grain technology appropriate for a single emulsion at half the speed (because the double layer gives roughly twice the density for a given exposure), or about ISO 50 for "full speed" material -- and in general, the slower the emulsion, the smaller the halide grains and the faster they'll clear in the fixer. Further, they're cubic grain rather than tabular; tabular grain takes 2-3 times as long to clear for a given speed. A half speed double coated x-ray film probably has grain size comparable to one of the faster printing papers, which will fully fix in two minutes in rapid fixer; even the full speed version ought to fix almost as quickly as Ilford Pan F or an ortho litho copy film (which typically fix about like enlarging paper).
Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.
Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.
Regular film can clear pretty quickly too, but we don't see it as that's not done under safelight conditions.
Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.
I turn on the lights as soon as the film (regular film) is in the fixer. TMX takes like 4-6 minutes to clear. Most others are a little less. But not nearly as fast as x-ray (instantaneously, pretty much).