2 Attachment(s)
Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.
Here's an example of a paper negative and an X-Ray negative.
Same setup and lighting...
Paper Negative (ISO 3)
Attachment 101934
X-Ray Negative (ISO 100)
Attachment 101935
Not much between them, IMHO. The paper has a slightly different response curve, doesn't show the shadow detail as well as the X-Ray, but the paper is somehow more... mellow.
Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.
I'm not sure if this post belongs here, but this is for free stainless steel tanks and x-ray film holders for 10"x12" film developing.
They were used by the local veterinarian here in central Idaho. Would prefer pick-up if you just happen to be coming through Challis, Idaho.
Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.
That's a nice offer. Tanks are hard to find.
I have some and am too far away, but I wonder if the Vet got new ones or went Digital?
Do you know the situation?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Thad Gerheim
I'm not sure if this post belongs here, but this is for free stainless steel tanks and x-ray film holders for 10"x12" film developing.
They were used by the local veterinarian here in central Idaho. Would prefer pick-up if you just happen to be coming through Challis, Idaho.
Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Randy Moe
That's a nice offer. Tanks are hard to find.
I have some and am too far away, but I wonder if the Vet got new ones or went Digital?
Do you know the situation?
The Vet went digital, which makes me wonder if there are a lot of these sitting in storage units from Veterinarians and Dentists.
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
Kodak CGS , exposed for 150 ISO (to prove me theory about UV rich sources), development 7.30 1+100 R09, rotary
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3724/9...c7105bc9_c.jpg
Scan-130921-0002www by Sergei Rodionov, on Flickr
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
and the answer is? :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SergeiR
Kodak CGS , exposed for 150 ISO (to prove me theory about UV rich sources), development 7.30 1+100 R09, rotary
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Randy Moe
and the answer is? :)
ah. Sorry. Yes. Paper neg do same - you roughly x1.5-x2 base ISO rating to get same negative as if you working with flashes or indirect shade (think balcony or patio with serious overhang.. so it pick up reflected light + got extra shade)
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
Re: Images shot on X-ray film
Re: X-ray Film example and comparison.
Hi,
I have been watching this Thread for a while. I am finishing a basement darkroom and planning to get into large format, mostly 4x5 and a little 8x10. I have a general question about the use of xray film: Is there a summary page for all the great discussion which has happened in this forum? I am only aware of another forum on xray film here, the one on Images taken with xray film. Also, are there more forum on the subject of xray film?
Many years ago (almost 30 now!) I was shooting Kodak Technical Pan at 25ASA and processed in Technidol Liquid. The incredible rendition of continuous tone of the Tech Pan makes me want to try again with large format, but, the film is essentially unavailable now. I was wondering what experience people have with rendering continuous tone with xray film and if what suggestions people might have, type of film ("blue" vs. "green"), exposure, type of developer, etc. As you can see, I have not read through most of the posts here but I am slowly catching up!
Thanks in advance,
Mario