mmm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne
Printable View
mmm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne
I'm sorry but I see only prints not scans. Just me.
thank you, its a scan of the negative, its fuji hru ,
best luke
What are we talking about?
I think we want to differentiate between LF X-Ray scans that are heavily Photoshopped and neg to analog print reality.
Of course we also have a third reality of scanned LF neg, processed into a digital negative, then wet printed and contact printed or enlarged.
I am sure I missed one more variation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne
Century Graphic 23 with Pullin London Pulnar 2.8/100. Kodak Industrex MX125 stand developed in Fomadon LQR 1:14. 1 sec at f2.8.
No PP, just as it came out of my old Epson Perfection 3200.
http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20...00001WEB_1.jpg
Nice tones, straight from the scan...
I don't know if this has been asked before-
Are the dimensions of the 14x17 film exact, does anyone know the actual dimensions of the film in millimeters? Does it vary much by manufacturer?
Just today, I was wondering if 14X17 X-Ray and Ilford 14 X 17 fit the Chamonix holders.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jb7
Agfa's 14x17 x-ray film is 1/16" shorter in both directions. Don't know about other manufactures...probably about the same.Quote:
Originally Posted by jb7
Ghoulish old stump at Stave Lake, near the dam. X-ray green lat. Pyrocat-HD 10+10+100, tray. Carbon transfer print. Print is actually a bit sharper than piss poor scan. Apologies.