Printable View
What's wrong with the contrast in this pic? Looks great to me. But if you have a subject that needs less contrast, try using a stop less exposure. Also Sepia Toning was a traditional way of reducing contrast. On a wet print, of course. Sepia control on computer prints doesn't work, in my experience.Quote:
Originally Posted by StoneNYC
Which wrong X-ray thread? This one? http://www.largeformatphotography.in...ilm+comparison That was the first thread on X-ray and I still think this one should be merged with it. Why have two threads?Quote:
I think I shared with the wrong X-Ray thread before so adding to this one too
8x10 300mm f/11@1/8th
Ektascan @80 in DD-X
Still trying to get better (reduced) contrast with this film.
Don't you mean a stop more exposure?Quote:
Originally Posted by premortho
Try pre-exposing the film. I have and it works very well.
"In contrast" (pun) this is the same shot but using HP5+@250 in DD-X (posting for example purposes I know it's not x-ray film) to show you how the contrast is much reduced.Quote:
Originally Posted by premortho
Attachment 128239
How much are you diluting DDX? Have you tried exposing more and developing less? Are you printing the negative or just scanning them?
I was told this is the newer X-Ray thread, responses here...Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew O'Neill
http://www.largeformatphotography.in....php?p=1208746
Told by whom?
I think I like the x-ray version better. I like the contrast.....Quote:
Originally Posted by StoneNYC
It always seemed simple to me--there's one thread for technical discussions, one for images. Both are running and active, except when someone inevitably seems to want to start a technical run in the image thread.