Great!
Good light.
I almost missed the file name of the image.
:)
Printable View
Great!
Good light.
I almost missed the file name of the image.
:)
60w light? How long as the exposure and at what aperture?
EDIT: Never mind, I saw the name of the light above. It's actually 60 watts of LED which would be as bright as something incandescent with much, much more power. :)
I would say it is as bright as my 600w mole richardson, minus the heat and constant supply of globes needed. I was sceptical about using LED lighting, this one was cheap enough to experiment with, and so far it has been great. A bonus is the bowens mount
Now that's very nice Andrew meaning post 5164��
Thanks Bazz, they all look a little different when shrunk so much. Welcome I havent seen you on here before, look forward to seeing some of your masterpieces. Really enjoyed the landscapes you did.
Sorry Bob, its required for membership...:cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by bob carnie
This thread has given me the courage to try my hand at 8x10. The weath if information is a little overwhelming(I’m barely part way through it), but hopefully Ill be able to contribute soon. I just love the look the film gives and I think it should make really nice platinum and cyanotype prints.
Hello, I'm trying Kodak's x-ray film. the developer of collagen in the cuvette, after the development in the center remains a spot, as if there does not get the developer. Please tell me how can I fix it ? sorry about my English.
Attachment 185979
Looks like uneven development to me. Can you provide more details as to how it was processed?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sergei
What language do you know well?
que lingua?
Looks like agitation or sloshing problems
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sergei