The Howtek scan looks far superior on my monitor (Spectraview). Not only the color, but there is more detail. A lot more. I have the 850, but you are making me want a drum scanner.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Ruttenberg
Printable View
The Howtek scan looks far superior on my monitor (Spectraview). Not only the color, but there is more detail. A lot more. I have the 850, but you are making me want a drum scanner.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Ruttenberg
Re Mono Lake photograph at top of page. Thank you, Pat and Andrew.
Amazingly detailed image, Gabe!
Thank you. The original digitised version is ~ 91 megapixels, which would be a little absurd to upload. The one I posted above is only 2 megapixels, so unfortunately really doesn't do it any justice. Here is the link to the 20 megapixel resized version I uploaded to Flickr:Quote:
Originally Posted by George E. Sheils
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...7f32402e_o.jpg
The original contains significantly more detail still, however.
This is one from a hike yesterday with the 4x5. Fujinon 125mm, FP4 yellow green filter. Pyrocat HD.
https://i.imgur.com/ISyyjOp.jpg
Like this one. Nice scene and tones.Quote:
Originally Posted by David Schaller
Thanks Steven. I was happy that the wind did not have too much effect, after a long exposure
This is an image containing other compositions within it. It might be fun to play with a pair of cropping L's and see what you find.
https://scatteredlightblog.files.wor.../sheet0243.jpg
Bullerfallet
Northern Sweden
Chamonix 45H-1, G-Claron 9/240, Fomapan400 9x12
That's a wonderful photo--waterfalls don't usually hold much in the way of intrinsic interest for me, but just the light on the trees in the upper frame is special.Quote:
Originally Posted by lassethomas