There are no much differences between these two photos. The Large format equipment is not giving any changes.
Printable View
There are no much differences between these two photos. The Large format equipment is not giving any changes.
Wow! What great photographs. Here's one from Hyder, AK. Salmon glacier. 5x7, Ilford fp4+, 210mm Apo Symmar, polarizer. Diafine. microtek 1800f.
Regards, Richard
MPP MicroTechnical Mk.VII, Schneider Xenar 135mm, 9×12cm Fomapan 100, Rodinal.
Sometimes it's easier to go lightweight, especially if with the family... Just one lens, small format ( :) )...
This thread is another great introduction to this forum, and I'm a bit overwhelmed by it.
But it also explains why I'm coming back to larger formats. I don't know about Bill, but I can see the tonality of the format even in small prints and web displays. These have what my work with digital and up through medium format for the last 15 years or so have lacked.
And I greatly appreciate Jim Kitchen's words to Jiri, which describes the review I've been engaged in for the last little while.
Thank you all for the great clarity of vision.
Rick "with no LF work currently in the digital domain to show, but hoping to correct that soon" Denney
Welcome! I know you will like this forum.
Mariposa Grove, Yosemite Park, CA
http://machinearts.com/fredphotos/bigtrees1.jpg
Hot damn Jeffrey,,, always a pleasure to see your fine work..!Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Sipress
Crestone after a spring blizzard. E100G, 300/9M f32, 1/30.
http://www.ladewigs.com/Gallery/d/19...090430_002.jpg
My backyard during a spring squall. Taken April 25. Spring is slow to arrive here. The photo above was taken just a week before.
Portra 400NC, 300/9M, f45, 8 seconds
http://ladewigs.com/Gallery/d/1989-1...090430_001.jpg
Spring Cottonwoods, Garden of the Gods.
NPS 160, 300/9M, f32, 1
http://www.ladewigs.com/Gallery/d/19...430_003_SL.jpg