Large Format Landscapes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nana Sousa Dias

Attachment 120280

NSD 45 PS, Schneider SA 47 XL, Fomapan 100

---

Great work, awesome, I like your work always.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RSalles

Nana,
Thanks,

Renato
(who also was born in Sao Paulo but which name is not Rodrigo).

BTW, andei vendo fotos incriveis tuas no forum esquina da foto, grande trabalho, parabéns!

---

Obrigado, Renato, aqui, você pode ver minhas fotos: www.nanasousadias.com

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by panoral

Great work, awesome, I like your work always.

---

Thank you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nana Sousa Dias

Stone, I hate developing films. I develop ALL my 50 and 100 asa films with Rodinal 1+50, continuous agitation. I'm not a lab rat. I always shoot at half the speed anouced by film manufacturers, just for improved shadow details. I use to do reciprocity failure tests with each film I use, and then I make my own reciprocity failure charts and, that's it. I do it because, sometimes, film manufacturers ar too much optimists, as is the case of Fomapan 100.

---

I had exactly one batch of film tested -- the Zone VI method -- once upon a time. It was supposedly 400 but actually 200.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by finarphin

I had exactly one batch of film tested -- the Zone VI method -- once upon a time. It was supposedly 400 but actually 200.

---

Film speed depends a lot on the developer we use, almost eveybody nows that but, I don't know what developers are used by the film manufacturers on their tests, they ALWAYS get more speed of their films than we do! ;-)
Here is what I have concluded, for a few years using these films and Rodinal. I always use zone system and spot metering. Sometimes I use compensation time development, for contrast control, by ZS method (N+1, N+2, N-1, etc)

Indicated by manufacturer (asa / iso) Real film speed with Rodinal

Kodak Tmax 100............................................................... 64
Fomapan 100 ................................................................. 50
Fuji Acros 100 .................................................................64
Adox Art series 100............................................................50
Ilford FP4+ 125 ................................................................ 64
Kodak Plus-x Pan 125........................................................ 64
Ilford HP5+ 400 .............................................................. 200
Kodak Tri-x 320 ...............................................................200

When I only had 35mm cameras, and started doing my own dev, I thought some films were "better" than others, or certain camera/lens/film combinations were a magic bullet. When I started with medium format and Rodinal, I quickly realised the film manufacturers were being a bit optimistic with their ISO figures, and more exposure/less development was the key. Still refining my developing technique with 4x5, but as with 120 I usually halve the stated speed and develop in Rodinal 1+50.

Unless I get hold of a densitometer, that's as scientific as my film speed testing gets :) but I'm glad others have confirmed, by methods imperious or scientific, my suspicions.

There are some truly inspiring shots on this forum

Attachment 120448

Shen Hao HZX 45 IIA, Schneider Symmar S 150mm, Fomapan 100.

Thats beautiful Nana, Deep rich tones and great, natural lines..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by alexn

Thats beautiful Nana, Deep rich tones and great, natural lines..

---

Thanks, Alex.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Peter_Jones

When I only had 35mm cameras, and started doing my own dev, I thought some films were "better" than others, or certain camera/lens/film combinations were a magic bullet. When I started with medium format and Rodinal, I quickly realised the film manufacturers were being a bit optimistic with their ISO figures, and more exposure/less development was the key. Still refining my developing technique with 4x5, but as with 120 I usually halve the stated speed and develop in Rodinal 1+50.

Unless I get hold of a densitometer, that's as scientific as my film speed testing gets :) but I'm glad others have confirmed, by methods imperious or scientific, my suspicions.

There are some truly inspiring shots on this forum

---

Peter,

As far as I know, the only REAL magic combination is a good scenery, nice light and hope that the guy behind the gg doesn't spoil everything.