I love the snap in the 300mm shot, and the tones in the 90mm one.
Printable View
I love the snap in the 300mm shot, and the tones in the 90mm one.
Bryan, these are stunning! Love the waterfall and the lighthouse photos.
Pali
Possibly. There's a bit of abstraction in the 300 shot, as if the strands of water were hair. More graphic, and definitely a unique perspective, at least that's what my eye tells me...Quote:
Originally Posted by Corran
Thanks Pali!
Agree Brandon. I'll have to make some prints and see what I can get, with the focus issue I mentioned above on the 300mm shot.
I have solved most of sudden out of focus issues with a Cham by two things:Quote:
Originally Posted by Corran
* Replacing the original nuts on the rear standard with wing-nuts from Home Depot. The original nuts are weak and wear out.
* Using a short piece of aluminum carpet trim (its length slightly exceeding camera bed width) squeezed between front and rear standards when I assemble the camera to shoot with 58-150mm lenses. That is to keep the standards precisely parallel to each other. Not needed for longer lens as with these lenses the front standard can be precisely aligned against the edge of the bed.
These are good suggestions for helping alignment. I need to do some tests to see if my film plane is out of place from the GG image, rather than an alignment issue.
Bryan,
I like the images of Yellow Branch Falls. Also, it occurred to me that if the same shot were taken after the leaves had fallen the water would look like icicles.
Keith
I am in the early stage of making a set of small clamps to use on my Chamonix 45H-1 to keep the front and rear standards parallel. I find that the rear one especially can get a slight swing in it that you wouldn't notice unless you look for it. So for now, I have got in the habit of checking front and rear standards as part of my set up routine. I know your supposed to do this any ways, but since these are held by friction, it really needs to be done each time. The clamps will prevent this and will be used to zero out if swing is ever used. They will also allow shifting without any swing being introduced.
Keith, I definitely need to return in the fall/winter!
Steven, interesting that the H model is still problematic. I figured the refined design would be less prone to misalignment. I'm still slumming with the very first model (that I bought used back in like 2011).
Hi Steve,Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Ruttenberg
Technical question - I had to wait until back at home to look at my scanning software! Scanned as linear raw 48bit RGB and converted to 16 bit grey later.
Cheers
Graham