Nana, its excellent! ClaudioSz
Printable View
Nana, its excellent! ClaudioSz
Very impressive shots, but noisy and "digital" scans.
Hey Numbnuts, who are you referring to?
Maybe you ought to read through this thread from the beginning, critiques are welcome if they have been asked for and generally those with frequent negative comments take themselves elsewhere! Or, maybe since you're the expert here, you can offer how they can scan prints just as good as your work. (we haven't seen your work, just someone elses).
Quote:
Originally Posted by federico9001
I was referring to Nana Sousa's files.
Anyway amazing shots
Nana, what was your exposure time for this one? There is motion in the clouds and the water, but still a sense of detail.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nana Sousa Dias
Rick "thinking exposure time one of those really important artistic decisions" Denney
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdenney
Thanks, Rick
The exposure time was 5 seconds. This was a very windy day, clouds were very low, so, they were passing really fast.
:)Quote:
Originally Posted by federico9001
Thanks, Federico.
When you have a bit dense negative and you try to get some detail on sky, with a scanner wich costs 600 euros, like the Epson v700, you will have some noise, for sure.
As to "digital" scans, I don't understand that, is there any ANALOG SCANNER? If there is, tell me, I wanna buy one...:confused:
Thanks, PeterQuote:
Originally Posted by Peter J. De Smidt
Quote:
Originally Posted by lbenac
Thanks, ClaudioQuote:
Originally Posted by ClaudioSz
That is a very good point and it really makes the picture. I have to say that I am not so succesfull on my "longer" exposure .Quote:
Originally Posted by rdenney
An old one, but it'll have to do for now.
The Grand Canyon
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7041/6...e911388b_b.jpg
http://www.flickr.com/photos/austingranger/