Re: Large Format Landscapes
Rooster,
Great shots from DV; how long ago were you there?
Cheers,
Leon
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElRooster
A couple of landscapes from Death Valley
Toyo 45A with Rodenstock 90mm F 6.7, FP4+, B+W Red filter and Rodinal
Re: Large Format Landscapes
This is Wonderful - I like the simplicity of the composition.
Cheers,
Leon
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tripod
Rodenstock 210 T-Max 100 (4x5)
Re: Large Format Landscapes
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SocalAstro
Rooster,
Great shots from DV; how long ago were you there?
Cheers,
Leon
Hi Leon,
These were from a few years before I went on a photography hiatus, probaly around 2000. I recently started again a few months back, the passion spark has been relit, even bought a Kodak 2D 5x7 camera. I'm scanning more old negatives and will share them. Thanks
Re: Large Format Landscapes
Re: Large Format Landscapes
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElRooster
[CENTER]A few more from Death Valley...
The last one is nice... but could get even better by including more foreground and less sky (or just less sky), in my opinion
Re: Large Format Landscapes
I think you are right, definitely less sky. I should crop it, it seems much stronger that way. Thanks. :)
Re: Large Format Landscapes
Quote:
Originally Posted by
S.Charles
Film: Ektar 100 4x5
Shot this a few weeks ago shortly after snow storm in Sandy Hook. This is the only picture I took that day.
Love the tonality in this, gorgeous! I find myself using ektar 100 as my goto 4x5 film of choice.
Re: Large Format Landscapes
Madison River Valley & Madison Range Mountains, Montana
Zone VI, Rodenstock 135mm APO Sironar S, Betterlight scan back
http://web.mac.com/routlaw/iWeb/Phot...1020_b%26w.jpg
Re: Large Format Landscapes
Great Photos, Rob and Rooster.
Re: Large Format Landscapes
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MumbleyJoe
As usual, I caught up on all of the great posts since I last checked in only to be overwhelmed at the quality. I'm not bringing anything particularly new or even competent to the table here... sigh.
I think it holds its own quite nicely..