Digital IR

A test of 665nm for portraits:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/kj97fqm8eg...Edit.jpg?raw=1

https://www.dropbox.com/s/q7cuihvyq4...Edit.jpg?raw=1

I like'em both Peter.

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...a83e5d40_b.jpg
Turbo HD Space TV by tuco, on Flickr

Zeiss 25/2.8 + R72

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tuco

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...28736c45_b.jpg
Spring by tuco, on Flickr

M9, Voigtländer Nokton 50/1.5, R72

---

This is lovely

So delicate

Martin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tuco

I like'em both Peter.

---

Thanks, Tuco! I've really enjoyed your posts....

I'm not sold on IR for portraits, or maybe it's my system or processing. Ari's look better.

Thanks, Peter. I avoid IR portraits like the plague. Stick to buildings and landscapes.
A good thing to keep in mind is there are no rules or a right way to process IR.
Lately, I've cut out the channel swap. The colors I get are more interesting, at least for my taste right now.

Thanks Martin and Peter.


I think another camera is needed to make the message more meaningful. But there is no cable going up the post for these surveillance cameras anyway.


https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...f1ac264e_b.jpg
24 Hour Surveillance by tuco, on Flickr

Zeiss 25/2.8 + R72

Apparently there was a lot of dumping....:)

https://www.dropbox.com/s/lmt42qij0y...Edit.jpg?raw=1

https://www.dropbox.com/s/f9tp7zzofz...Edit.jpg?raw=1

Hey guys

I do like all this

but fear you are depicting Fallout

duck and cover will not work

but I know how from grade school