Re: Difference between Sironar n and Sironar s
Joe:
I shoot buildings in mid distance scenes at apertures between f16 and f22.
In 8x10 I don't use movements on the 210mm very much, if at all, so I couldn't really comment on degree of movement within the image-circle.
For 4x5 it's great knowing that the big image circle is there in case I do want the movements. It's the look that does it for me, compared to the 150mm Sironar-N, there's a richness in the print which I can't get with the 150mm ....
Re: Difference between Sironar n and Sironar s
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ron Bose
Joe:
I shoot buildings in mid distance scenes at apertures between f16 and f22.
In 8x10 I don't use movements on the 210mm very much, if at all, so I couldn't really comment on degree of movement within the image-circle.
For 4x5 it's great knowing that the big image circle is there in case I do want the movements. It's the look that does it for me, compared to the 150mm Sironar-N, there's a richness in the print which I can't get with the 150mm ....
the differences could better be tested by using Mamiya RB 67/70 vaccum back. I have now images of the back from an altered version (to use also 61.5mm/120/220 films)converted by Vermeercameras/Cezary Barczak. i also have the instruction have to do the conversion. Its only donor-left side-hinges will be changed. right side will stay 70mm-cartrige.
I am in testphase/dry i will not shoot in near future.
I will show it here when time is right. had a lot of computer-problems over 6 months. Firefox crashing. now solved. still not ready everything.
I could get 150mm apo-sironar N. need copal-0-shutter for pinhole-purposes.