Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
David Schaller
Thanks Randy. It was Pan F, which for me is either great or extremely problematic. For example, I don't know what's going on here, the sky is full of crap. I'm very bummed. This time it was Pyrocat with normal agitation. The FP4 I developed at the same time was fine.
http://i.imgur.com/asYocyf.jpg
It's a nice photo. As for that "sky crap" I get it every once and a while too and am still trying to troubleshoot it as I too find it on some rolls but not others from the same development canister.
Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
I had that with several rolls of fresh Pan F once. I have simply decided not to shoot Pan F - don't see a point to it myself.
Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
The view from below one of four eighteen-cylinder Wright R-3350 Turbo-Compound radial engines perched on the wings of a retired Douglas DC-7B at the Coolidge Municipal Airport, Arizona.
https://c3.staticflickr.com/8/7615/2...25bc0130_c.jpg
Hasselblad 500C/M - Zeiss Distagon f/3.5 60 mm CF
Fuji ACROS 100 + HC-110 (dil H)
Scanned via Epson v850
Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Corran
I had that with several rolls of fresh Pan F once. I have simply decided not to shoot Pan F - don't see a point to it myself.
Well you are probably right, insofar as the alternatives -- for me, FP4 and ACROS -- are good. But there is a look to the PanF that I like, a smooth transition between tones.
Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
David Schaller
Well you are probably right, insofar as the alternatives -- for me, FP4 and ACROS -- are good. But there is a look to the PanF that I like, a smooth transition between tones.
Me too. Love Pan F. And I've not had that exclusively with only Pan F. Less so now that I used a Jobo 2553 canister and a reversing motor with constant agitation but not eliminated entirely.
Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Salmo22
The view from below one of four eighteen-cylinder Wright R-3350 Turbo-Compound radial engines perched on the wings of a retired Douglas DC-7B at the Coolidge Municipal Airport, Arizona.
https://c3.staticflickr.com/8/7615/2...25bc0130_c.jpg
Hasselblad 500C/M - Zeiss Distagon f/3.5 60 mm CF
Fuji ACROS 100 + HC-110 (dil H)
Scanned via Epson v850
I love your aircraft photos!
Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rich815
I love your aircraft photos!
Thanks Rich. Once in a while I try my hand at something non-aviation...
The Grand Mauna Lani Bay Hotel - Tacna, AZ
https://c5.staticflickr.com/8/7697/2...0877fc9f_c.jpg
Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
John Olsen
Randy,
I like the unusual composition of the second one, with foreground elements in focus and pointing to a mysterious mid-distance structure. Maybe it could even take more vignetting in the printing to capture the viewers eye toward the barn (I think you did some already?) Nice work.
Thanks John, and no, I hadn't done anything to the image other than scan the neg and adjust the levels slightly.
Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Salmo22
Thanks Rich. Once in a while I try my hand at something non-aviation...
The Grand Mauna Lani Bay Hotel - Tacna, AZ
This is one of those images that gives me a sensation that I am there, in the heat and quietness. I really like it.
Re: MF (6x4.5,6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Randy
This is one of those images that gives me a sensation that I am there, in the heat and quietness. I really like it.
Thank you Randy. Now back to an airplane-related image. This is a low pressure turbine from an Allison T56-A1 turboprop engine - once used on a Lockheed C-130 Hercules transport. This is my first time using Ilford PanF 50 film. It is definitely different from the Fuji Acros 100 I typically use. While more testing is required, I think I like it. Trying different types of film is so much fun, it causes me to think I could easily become a film whore :rolleyes:
https://c5.staticflickr.com/8/7131/2...f29b48e4_c.jpg
Hasselblad 500C/M + Zeiss Planar f/3.5 100mm CF + Ilford PanF 50 + HC-110 (dil H) + Scanned Epson v850