Re: Large Format Landscapes
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ben Calwell
That’s beautiful. How long was the exposure, and how did you develop the negative?
Exposure was around 15 minutes f/16 on fp4.
Developed in Xtol 1+1 for 13 min in rotation so pushed a bit.
Still a hint of ambient light being so far north.
But the moon travels a fair bit in that time so I made a much shorter exposure for the moon part and then assembled in PS
Re: Large Format Landscapes
Now that's some fancy hybrid work. These photos are gorgeous.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lassethomas
Exposure was around 15 minutes f/16 on fp4.
Developed in Xtol 1+1 for 13 min in rotation so pushed a bit.
Still a hint of ambient light being so far north.
But the moon travels a fair bit in that time so I made a much shorter exposure for the moon part and then assembled in PS
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Large Format Landscapes
French Alps:
Attachment 230564
Ebony RW45 / Nikkor-W 150 f/5.6 / TXP320 / Yellow Filter / HC110 / Epson V800
Mak.
Re: Large Format Landscapes
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...3325bfbe_b.jpgBackyard Snow by Nokton48, on Flickr
1980s Sinar Norma 4x5 210mm f5.6 Nikkor, 4x5 Tri-X pro D76 1:1. 8x10 fibre print Fortezo, Omega DII Omegalite Dektol 1:2
Re: Large Format Landscapes
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...a2c91e76_b.jpgLudlow Falls 1980s 4x5 Norma 90mm F8 SA by Nokton48, on Flickr
Ludlow Falls 1980s 4x5 Norma 90mm F8 Super Angulon HP5 D76 1:1 fiber 8x10 print Fortezo Dektol Omega DII Omegalite
Re: Large Format Landscapes
https://scatteredlightblog.files.wor.../sheet0478.jpg
The river Vojmån with Borka in the background.
Kittelfjäll in northern Sweden
Chamonix 45H-1, G-Claron 240mm, 9x12 FP4+
Re: Large Format Landscapes
Re: Large Format Landscapes
Amicalola Creek, Fall 2022
Speed Graphic, modded with Pentax 67 35mm f/4.5 fisheye, at f/22 with yellow filter on T-Max 100 dev'd in Acufine:
https://blogger.googleusercontent.co...fish-0443s.jpg
This lens was mounted using a 3D printed adapter (thanks to LargeSense Camera for providing the file that was edited and printed by Zebra Dry Plates). Camera was taken apart and the bed physically bent to get out of the way of the image circle. Still debating ripping it off entirely. Since the FFD of all P67 lenses are the same, I can use any of them on this 4x5 - I've heard some cover or nearly cover, so I'll try all of mine at some point, but the 35mm was my main interest. This was one of the first test images I made this afternoon. Especially interested in doing some architectural shots with this camera.
Re: Large Format Landscapes
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Corran
Amicalola Creek, Fall 2022
Speed Graphic, modded with Pentax 67 35mm f/4.5 fisheye, at f/22 with yellow filter on T-Max 100 dev'd in Acufine:
This lens was mounted using a 3D printed adapter (thanks to LargeSense Camera for providing the file that was edited and printed by Zebra Dry Plates). Camera was taken apart and the bed physically bent to get out of the way of the image circle. Still debating ripping it off entirely. Since the FFD of all P67 lenses are the same, I can use any of them on this 4x5 - I've heard some cover or nearly cover, so I'll try all of mine at some point, but the 35mm was my main interest. This was one of the first test images I made this afternoon. Especially interested in doing some architectural shots with this camera.
Very very good! This is top craftmanship, combined with a very well succeeded original and artistic result; a rare combination. Incredible, rarely seen depth and 3D effect. Congrats
Re: Large Format Landscapes
Nice Bryan!
OK...here's a mind-bending question: what if you mounted two of these Pentax fisheye lenses on a board and placed them in front of a long-format camera - for "fisheye stereo" images? You could probably also cobble together some optics from a supply house (like Edmund Optics) to best take advantage of the specific properties of the images in creating a fisheye stereo viewing device?
Further thought - I'd imagine that in the above scenario the interocular distance would (due to lens front diameters) be significantly further apart than that of most human eyes and thus the 3-D effect would be further exaggerated...could be great!