Good idea!
Must be the plain paper, not wax cups
I was looking on Amazon yesterday for new Tare cups
No findum
will look again
I have a few left
I need much smaller cups
Printable View
Found um
Last ordered 2015!
https://www.amazon.com/SEOH-Plastic-...3101948&sr=8-9
You can also use cupcake/muffin papers liners. Hundreds for dirt cheap and they take up no space. I use them for things like carbonate, sulfite… I just get them at the supermarket. They each weigh 0.5g. For small amounts and/or trickier compounds I just use little weighing papers I cut from plain paper.
Philip,
If your Metol isn't of even enough consistency or compresses irregularly, then weighing instead of using spoon measures will certainly be more accurate and precise.
I only advocate spoon recipes for situations where the volume measurement can be easily and accurately repeated. It helps also when the formula is one that has a larger margin of error. My Metol is of even enough consistency that I'm not concerned about using spoon measurements to mix print developers. I'd likely want to be sure that my spooning was repeatable before using it for D-23 or other film developers, which is why I suggested weighing out a few teaspoons to see if you could find a mean volume that gave you the weight you needed within a reasonable variation for the developer you're compounding. If you can't, the get out the scales.
For those that disparage spoon recipes, however, I'd just like to point out that volume measurements of things with an even consistency can be extremely accurate (that's what we do with liquids, right?). And, weighing things out isn't always as precise as we think. Powdered chemicals often absorb water from the air, changing the amount of active ingredient per unit of weight. Weighing out an amount of older sodium carbonate anhydrous can get you significantly less carbonate that you think you're getting if there has been significant water absorption.
It's important to know how precise you need to be with a specific formula and weigh that against the convenience of using the likely less-accurate spoon measures. If slight variations in proportions make a significant difference, then use the most precise methods of measuring possible. If not, save a bit of time and grab the measuring spoons.
Best,
Doremus
I don't care what method anybody uses
I worked in test labs most of my life
I treat every chem/food/etc as poison
I am careful
I quit a Chem lab age 21 because one damn fool thought fluffy asbestos was 'pretty'
He would toss a handful into light
An oven also exploded as the 'scientist' wrote a procedure and he not think about glue solvent vapor
I was looking at the locked oven and somehow felt the pressure minutes before the door blew with a big boom
So big it shut down the whole huge factory
I don't trust experts
guns either
'experts' told me several times, it was not loaded
Agree. Particularly in the case of D-23 the amounts are large enough that quite of bit of measurement slop can be tolerated. Even in Haist’s book for example (which like any proper chem book has an entire chapter devoted to mixing, calculations etc.) the “spoon” version of D-23 makes an appearance as legit.
Print developers too, in general.
I have long just spooned Citric Acid Powder for stop
almost ready to begin D23
I will store my Rodinol for harder times
I have plenty of D23 part a and part b
I follow Ken Lee as he has always made sense
D 23
https://www.kennethleegallery.com/ht...igh%20contrast.