What is the ideal lighting source for silver prints for display?

Does light source (like halogen) affect the quality of the silver printing during exhibition?

If yes, what could be the ideal lighting method for exhibiting photographs in a studio without compromising the quality of the displayed work?

Thanks!

/zenny

---

Support http://thehumanape.com

Yes, light source and brightness affects the presentation.

It is normal for professionals to print & tone for a given setting.

If you can change the lighting, like in your house, then you can change the look of a given print.

I can't speak for the type of lights or the correct balances for archival purposes, but I will address position. The worst exhibit of photography I've ever seen for it's presentation was an Ansel Adams exhibit at our local art museum. The lights were about six or seven feet back from the wall which meant that if you wanted to get close enough to view fine details, you cast a deep shadow on the exact area of the prints that you wished to see better. Impossible to enjoy!

Place your lights within no more than two feet of the wall so you can get good illumination even if you want to get right on top of the prints for a very close in viewing experience.

If you have some MR16 track and lighting fixtures a good alternative for a decent price are the Solux Lighting gallery bulbs which run around $7.95 a bulb and produce a full color spectrum of natural daylight with ultra-low UV and IR. The bulbs come in four color temp options 3500K, 4100K, 4700K, & 5000K and with four beam spread options. I personally find that these bulbs display and illuminate silver prints very nicely for the cost.

+1 on the Solux bulbs. I've been using them quite a while now and really like them. You can get them in sizes to fit normal recessed can or track lights as well as with transformers. They also had a really neat setup where you could adjust the beam with masks to eliminate keystoning and just illuminate the photo/artwork. Gets a bit expensive though.

Also - I've noticed that they seem to have a higher percentage of duds than regular lights - maybe 5% to 10% have been blowing out the frst or second time I switch them on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jim Andrada

+1 on the Solux bulbs.

Also - I've noticed that they seem to have a higher percentage of duds than regular lights - maybe 5% to 10% have been blowing out the frst or second time I switch them on.

---

Do they replace or give credit on duds that burn out quickly.

Mike

The GE "Precise Constant Color" series of MR 16 bulbs is also worth a look. The color temperature is 3000K, normal for halogen bulbs, but lower than the Solux (who would need filters in the reflector or in front to get their color temperatures)

http://www.largeformatphotography.in...084#post707084 and the more general http://www.largeformatphotography.in...judging-prints.

No sense in repeating myself. Coincidentally, you might also be interested in this.

There are two different issues involved. One is how optical brighteners will fluoresce under
halogens or other high UV sources. Bad for color prints; but it's how galleries really make
black and white silver print really 'pop'. The other question regards color temp and visual
spectral distribution, just like displaying color prints. And a lot of this has to do with what
kind of tone or toners are involved. Selenium or warm gold toning for example, is more
apparent under a warmer light source; but you might prefer a higher color temp for cold toned prints. You need to experiment.

@Michael C.

Yes - I've never had a hard time getting the Solux duds replaced. Just call and talk to the mand they will take care of it. Sorry to be late getting back to you ut I've been on the road for business the last few days.