Sanderson "Hand and Stand" Quarter Plate modified for 9X12cm
Hello.
I am proud to present my new toy, a beautiful mahogany Sanderson quarter plate camera that I have converted to 9X12cm trying to let the camera as much original as I could. :) Circa 1902
I had some unknown brand 9X12 sheet film holders of good quality, quantity 6 that were taking dust in a closet, and with some model plywood I did this modification. I had to modify the ground glass register, narrow and lengthen the holder gate.
It is very light, and compact, I am currently making a lens board for a Rodenstock Apo Sironar S "digital" :rolleyes:135mm f/5.6. in a prewar Compur Rapid. I will need to remove the lens elements to close the camera but no big deal.
https://www.hebergeur-image.com/uplo...2b1ca78b31.jpg
https://www.hebergeur-image.com/uplo...2b1e74b32a.jpg
https://www.hebergeur-image.com/uplo...2b46e3defa.jpg
https://www.hebergeur-image.com/uplo...2b491a8479.jpg
Re: Sanderson "Hand and Stand" Quarter Plate modified for 9X12cm
Wonderful!
Sometimes the red Russian leather is still perfect
Re: Sanderson "Hand and Stand" Quarter Plate modified for 9X12cm
Re: Sanderson "Hand and Stand" Quarter Plate modified for 9X12cm
Great modification indeed keeping the looks of the camera as if original
Re: Sanderson "Hand and Stand" Quarter Plate modified for 9X12cm
I finally bought a 135mm f/6.3 CZJ Tessar T from 1951 (70°angle, image circle 189mm @ f/22) and made a lens board. :)
Lightweight camera, 1,1kg and 16X15X8cm:cool:
https://www.hebergeur-image.com/uplo...b45c29cddb.jpg
Re: Sanderson "Hand and Stand" Quarter Plate modified for 9X12cm
Cool beans on threading those Sironar-S elements into that Prewar Compur...so long as the spacing is accurate! :cool:
Re: Sanderson "Hand and Stand" Quarter Plate modified for 9X12cm
Modern Copal and prewar Compur have usually the same threading except for non standard lenses. Spacing is measured with a micrometer and eventually shimed. But I was unable to mount the lens and shutter on the Sanderson as the rear element interferes with the camera front standard :( So that's why I went for the Tessar.