Nude

Roger, thanks for passing that along. Now I have to go find some Louis Nizer reading (I recognize the name but don't know anything about him).

In my case, I am usually trying to work with one hand and a terrific headache, so I am safe from any accusations of artistry...

http://www.labo-argentique.com/bouti...KF-HP5-002.jpg
Linhof Bi-System / Fujinon 250SF / HP5 and rodinal

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aurélien87

http://www.labo-argentique.com/bouti...KF-HP5-002.jpg
Linhof Bi-System / Fujinon 250SF / HP5 and rodinal

---

Brr! It's cold in here!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jay Decker

Brr! It's cold in here!

---

What's the problem?

Clue: Erectile tissue and goosebumps.

Nice pair.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aurélien87

http://www.labo-argentique.com/bouti...KF-HP5-002.jpg
Linhof Bi-System / Fujinon 250SF / HP5 and rodinal

---

Thanks for getting this back on track!

Excellent selectively focused crumb catchers. :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aurélien87

What's the problem?

---

No problem! Just a comment!

Originally Posted by Jay DeFehr

I predict that soon a new kind of imaging will evolve that doesn't require a camera of any kind, or manual manipulation of any kind. It will be truly subjective, and transcend physical technique. I call it Quimaging. The quimager will simply look into a field and imagine an image, and the image will emerge, with higher resolution than is possible with classical optics. I wonder what quimagers will find to argue about?


That began in the 60's and they argued Timothy Leary...

PHOTOS PLEASE!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Asher Kelman

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...AL._SS500_.jpg

There seem to be plenty on amazon here. They are not clear about whether it's one book republished or two books? Is the the one to get, the newer one, 1997 or the older one, 1007 or are they one and the same one?

Asher

---

They are two different books, one of his street photographs and the other a broader selection made by Vogue editor Robin Muir. The book in your image is the latter.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sly

Frank's images, on the other hand, I skip past quickly. He certainly knows what he's doing technically, and I know he has fans. But he strikes me as mysogynistic in the extreme.

---

Frank had a carefully ordered portfolio of his images of women on the Internet not so long ago. It may still be there, in which case you might find it useful to have a look at it. It was artistically accomplished and the complete opposite of misogynistic. I can understand why, if one sees one or two if his images in isolation, one might come to your conclusion. Together, you could not be further from the truth. I think that he is creating a pastiche on the kinds of nudes that are posted here regularly, and that his work goes much deeper than the pastiche. He has a firm grasp of irony, but also pathos.