Printable View
Thanks, Peter, much appreciated.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter De Smidt
I specifically got out this camera because I didn't use it once in 2024, which is a shame, seeing as it's really nice to use and produces excellent images - even though the f3.5 Tessar doesn't get as much love as the f2.8 Planar. I've often considered getting one of the 2.8E Planar models, but then I produce a few photos with this camera and suddenly the notion of "upgrading" seems quite unnecessary!
Yes half of me would be in water. In the middle ground you can see a steep bank with a water mark there too. Where I'm standing is not as steep of a bank to get at the the water's edge.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter De Smidt
More from that roll...
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...15372a15_b.jpg
Winter Season - Foggy Delta by tuco, on Flickr
Pentax 6x7, 105/2.4, Rollei Superpan 200, D-23
Nice! Tuco, you seem to be getting good tonality range out of the Superpan 200.Quote:
Originally Posted by tuco
On my screen, at least, the color of the fog appears to be a warmer gray than the water. Intriguing.
I remain humbled by your tonal control and the strength of your composition.
Yes, it looks like it's on par with other films I use. The film is thin and curly with a pretty low base+fog density of around 0.10 which is not as low as their RPX 25 (~0.05 density) and Retro 80S films.Quote:
Originally Posted by rfesk
Looks that way on monitor too. But when I use a RGB meter tool and check the values of the sky and water, I get RGB= 220ish for the sky and RGB= 180-190ish for the brighter parts of the water. So the sky is brighter. The image is a grey scale (no toning).Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulophot
Iga, paulbarden, tuco : so nice images. Congratulations !
Thank you Bernard!Quote:
Originally Posted by Bernard_L
Yes, thank you very much, BernardQuote:
Originally Posted by paulbarden
FabulousQuote:
Originally Posted by paulbarden
Martin