Nude

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pieter

Wrong category. She's clothed.

---

Outstanding!

https://drscdn.500px.org/photo/10544...6d2a546b7965a1

Intrepid 8x10 + Symmar 300/5.6 + Fomapan 100

Attachment 235408

I have reworked an existing negative trying to produce something closer to what I imagined the original should look like.

It's quite a rubbish scan - the highlights on the print do have subtle graduations

5x4 camera + 210mm lens
HP5 + ID11 (1+1) @ 5 stops
Ilford Cooltone RC + MG Dev

Martin

Attachment 235634

I have reworked an existing negative trying to produce something closer to what I imagined the original should look like.

5x4 camera + 210mm lens
HP5 + ID11 (1+1) @ 5 stops
Ilford Cooltone RC + MG Dev

Martin

Yes we do need a reference

You found one

Thank you

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Martin Aislabie

Attachment 235634

I have reworked an existing negative trying to produce something closer to what I imagined the original should look like.

5x4 camera + 210mm lens
HP5 + ID11 (1+1) @ 5 stops
Ilford Cooltone RC + MG Dev

Martin

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tin Can

Yes we do need a reference

You found one

Thank you

---

Thank you

Martin

Attachment 236222

The print isn't just black and white as the scan suggests - there are some subtle details in the high key tones that I just cannot capture with my digital kit.

5x4 camera + 210mm lens
HP5 + ID11 (1+1) @ 5 stops
Ilford Cooltone RC + MG Dev

Martin

as old school pervert, raised on tiny snaps of nude

I prefer the nipple

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by szadow

https://drscdn.500px.org/photo/10544...6d2a546b7965a1

Intrepid 8x10 + Symmar 300/5.6 + Fomapan 100

---

My initial impression is "Beautifully Surreal". She's really quite thin and that biggie flower is the perfect compliment. Well done again.

Attachment 237023

Silhouette, 1971

4x5 Plus-X / D-76