It's actually 11 minutes, hah!Quote:
Originally Posted by gandolfi
Printable View
It's actually 11 minutes, hah!Quote:
Originally Posted by gandolfi
http://40.media.tumblr.com/f56e9f6bd...8bxwo1_640.jpg
sharnayla by Ben Rains, on Tumblr
Century Studio 10A w/8x10 back
Wollensak Vesta 14”/5
Ilford HP5 Plus / Adonal 1+50
Love the shot, love the model. I just wish we could see more of her left leg - just my two cents worth. That said it is a great image.Quote:
Originally Posted by benrains
-McCoy
Lovely, I like the vignettingQuote:
Originally Posted by benrains
This one is intended to be a recreation of a Alfred Cheney Johnston image. It's reasonably faithful, except I don't have anywhere near as nice or large of tapestries and rugs to work with, and her right leg isn't quite correct. The foot should be visible- http://www.goodkarmaproductions.com/...c_original.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by McCoy
Totally unintentional but I do think it works well here. Sometimes I forget that the Vestas, when used at longer distances with wider f-stops, (i.e. pretty much anything at f/11 or larger) vignette noticeably. They really were made for closer portrait work, but the vignetting may be worth noting if you're into that look for landscapes.Quote:
Originally Posted by StoneNYC
It's lovely, truly!Quote:
Originally Posted by benrains
I also love the vigneting. It seems to me like a picture from the silent film era.
http://40.media.tumblr.com/13c29a32d...8bxwo1_640.jpg
sharnayla by Ben Rains, on Tumblr
Century Studio 10A w/5x7 back (image cropped)
Wollensak Velostigmat 12"/4.5 (w/ modified soft-focus adjustment)
Ilford HP5 Plus / Adonal 1+50
Is the model purposefully out of focus while the edges are in focus? Was this done with intent?Quote:
Originally Posted by benrains
I like the softness on that making some mystery. The shadow is nice too.Quote:
Originally Posted by benrains
Even if it's cause by out of focus, that worked for J M Cameron.