Like
Printable View
Like
a number of studio portraits, shot with the Toyo/Omega View 45D:
Shot on expired and mostly underexposed T-Max 100 (at some point I will have to admit that I'm really bad in transferring digital readings to analog exposure in the studio):
https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7852/...3a1c6534_n.jpg https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1971/...53cc477d_n.jpg
Shot on expired and cross-processed Fuji CDU film. First one was horribly underexposed/underdeveloped.
https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7801/...dc7ddefe_n.jpg https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7885/...ed4723e9_n.jpg
The first three were shot with the Schneider Xenar 150mm/f5.6, the last one was shot with the Sinaron-S 240mm/f5.6.
No photoshop apart from spotting.
They look great to me! If you're talking about getting light levels set with a digital camera, my experience is that the digital cameras are significantly more sensitive at a given rating than film is.
Took and developed this one today.
But now that I see it this way I see some strange things going on... Like... noise?
Kodak T-Max 400
Ilfosol 3 (1/9)
https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7812/...ddc4af6a_b.jpgAstridStockmans by Smith De Westelinck, on Flickr
Love it Luke
They look like scanning / sharpening artifacts... is this the first time you encounter this??
Yes, I need to be over-exposing by at least one stop when I shoot in the studio (and use the light meter of the digital cameras). But I constantly forget to do so. :rolleyes:
Long time lurker, my first contribution to the portrait threads!
Wista 45 SP, Rodenstock Sironar-N 210mm at f8.0. Kodak T-Max 100 developed in ilford DD-X. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...031336e6e1.jpg
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk