shot against a white sheet, under an awning, with the sun illuminating the sheet. petzval lens. Omega 4x5 Tri-X. Rodinal 1-50 for 14 minutes.
Attachment 94514
Printable View
shot against a white sheet, under an awning, with the sun illuminating the sheet. petzval lens. Omega 4x5 Tri-X. Rodinal 1-50 for 14 minutes.
Attachment 94514
For the second time. How about you become a bit more constructive in your criticism? Either give some `` advise`` or show us how its done. Im about to break my own rules and start putting someone on my ignorelist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jac@stafford.net
Light as in something like this, for example.Quote:
Originally Posted by soeren
Clever, John..... but a tad cryptic for most :)
???
Now I know I am going to ignore this person. (jac@stafford)
Either the link doesn't work or you are linkin to an image of an icebear in a snowstorm .Quote:
Originally Posted by Jac@stafford.net
Best regards
The bear I see is biting on a white chocolate bar.
Sorry for that. It worked for me. Here is something else, not a nude: http://www.digoliardi.net/dawn_a.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by soeren
The point I wished to make earlier is that the nude subject is a good one to model with light.
BTW, I really like Ramiro Elena's Promoción Marc Parrot pictures. Great light, rendering, selective focus.
I don't know if criticism is welcome but I don't think Jac was out of line by mentioning the lighting wasn't really considered or controlled very well... I tend to agree with him. Except big knockers trump lighting for most guys.
Posting photos knowing you're going to draw blanket universal praise is a bit narcissistic isn't it? Finding something to improve upon - or at least challenging your pictures - should be welcomed. Insulting someone as an unintelligent drunk is reveals a lot doesn't it?