Re: MF (6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Michael Cienfuegos
Whew! You had me worried for a moment. I would still like to get a Medalist, even though I would have to respool every roll of film. Biggest mistake Kodak ever made was to make it a 620 camera. :(
You can but 620 fresh from B&H in about 6 different films :)
But of course it's re-rolled. And expensive, but available none-the-less, even in E100G amazingly.
I hear you, I love my Yashika44LM (127) so re-roll that myself too.
20 more rolls until the end of the year with the next ilford ULF run.
Re: MF (6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
StoneNYC
You can but 620 fresh from B&H in about 6 different films :)
But of course it's re-rolled. And expensive, but available none-the-less, even in E100G amazingly.
I hear you, I love my Yashika44LM (127) so re-roll that myself too.
20 more rolls until the end of the year with the next ilford ULF run.
Too expensive. I reroll it myself onto 620 spools. Easy and cheap.
I have a Yashica 44 (not the LM :( ) Still have a few rolls of teh efke film, have about a dozen or so rolls of old Verichrome Pan from the early 1960's. I'll use those spools and backing paper when I am able to get the Ilford film later this year.
m
Re: MF (6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Michael Cienfuegos
Too expensive. I reroll it myself onto 620 spools. Easy and cheap.
I have a Yashica 44 (not the LM :( ) Still have a few rolls of teh efke film, have about a dozen or so rolls of old Verichrome Pan from the early 1960's. I'll use those spools and backing paper when I am able to get the Ilford film later this year.
m
Good plan, that VP backing paper is very cool looking (I have one roll) but it's a lot stiffer than the EFKE stuff and tends to make less-flat pictures on backs with old springs. Alas...
The EFKE 127 I've shot all had EFKEitis, and I wouldn't use it ever again unless I were desperate, but I would use the backing paper...
Re: MF (6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Re: MF (6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
David R Munson
I like this one, David. It's good conceptually, too. I'd steal the idea if it weren't for the fact that I am the one who does the chopping and cooking in our house. Although, I suppose that's what self-timers are for. :)
Jonathan
Re: MF (6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Jonathan - I've accumulated a bunch of my two friends (in this image) cooking and whatnot. I need to explore the negatives more, but immediately liked this one. A camera and a tripod make surprisingly good accessories to milling around in the kitchen with a beer in hand while friends work on dinner.
Got a little sleep eventually, but did more scans as well:
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5544/1...e0fa0e55_z.jpg
Who Needs Money by David R Munson, on Flickr
Re: MF (6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
I thought i could share 2 pictures i scanned from the first roll I processed coming back from a road trip in Utah during Winter . Both taken in Buckskin Gulch slot canyon, with a Hassy on Fuji acros
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3803/1...dee0f13c_z.jpg
Le Ventre du Monde by L'Eidolon, on Flickr
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7325/1...590cfd8e_z.jpg
Passage by L'Eidolon, on Flickr
Re: MF (6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Myxine
That first one is well composed and well exposed :)
Re: MF (6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Myzine, I like both. The latter reminds of some of Barnbaum's images at their best. I especially like the peering around the corner and the log.
Re: MF (6x6,6x7,6x9,6x12) B&W film images sharing
Thank you both! I think the second one might be on a N-1 roll and might show more details in the highlights