Re: The Scientific Lens Co.
I have a 5.5 inch that is marked for whole plate (and does cover 6.5x8.5) so an 8 or 9 inch ought to be good for more than 8x10. Maybe 11x14?
Re: The Scientific Lens Co.
Slap that puppy on a cardboard lensboard, or put it in an iris mount and lets see what she'll do. Thats your homework assignment for tomorrow.
Re: The Scientific Lens Co.
Attached is an ad from 1907. I assume the # 5 is the 10x12 inch model
Dan
Re: The Scientific Lens Co.
My EXTREME W. A. ANASTIGMAT made by the Scientific Lens Co. New York, serial 13006, is marked for 11x14 and has a focal length of about 10". It has the remains of an iris diaphram. This would agree with the data that Dan provided.
Re: The Scientific Lens Co.
I also have the 11x14 version as well as the 8x10 lens and the focal lengths agree with Dan's chart.
Re: The Scientific Lens Co.
Dan, the "on hand" numbers are interesting. If they equate to popularity of sizes at that time, everything up through 8x10 is equal and 10x12, while only half as popular as the 8x10, is twice as popular as the 11x14. It doesn't seem like 10x12 is mentioned much today.
Re: The Scientific Lens Co.
Thank you all for your help. I will try it out and get back to you all.
Arthur
Re: The Scientific Lens Co.
I bet these get confused with the Wide Angle Rectilinears a lot, though the Anastigmats came later. Interesting to see on the table CCHarrison posted, that even back then, the price on the Net was much lower than the list price!
Re: The Scientific Lens Co.
I have a little Lens drom the Scientific Lens Co. called the artistic. 2 elements, no iris. It' about 7", covers 4x5 and is fairly soft. Nothing on line anywhere..Ideas?