Marc Ropac
25-Apr-2004, 03:57
Hello,
does a plasmat design (Symmar, Sironar etc.) always offer a significantly higher resolution than a wide angle design (Grandagon, Super-Angulon, etc.) of the same age and focal length? Is this a theoretical advantage or is it visible on the light table?
I think especially about the focal length between 110 and 135mm. I have a razor sharp Sironar-S 135 and think about replacing it with a lens with more coverage (Grandagon 115 or Super Angulon 120). My budget would not allow to just add a wide angle. I have to decide one way or the other
The Super Symmar 110 is too expensive, you don't need to tell me that it is fantastic.
Thank you a lot
does a plasmat design (Symmar, Sironar etc.) always offer a significantly higher resolution than a wide angle design (Grandagon, Super-Angulon, etc.) of the same age and focal length? Is this a theoretical advantage or is it visible on the light table?
I think especially about the focal length between 110 and 135mm. I have a razor sharp Sironar-S 135 and think about replacing it with a lens with more coverage (Grandagon 115 or Super Angulon 120). My budget would not allow to just add a wide angle. I have to decide one way or the other
The Super Symmar 110 is too expensive, you don't need to tell me that it is fantastic.
Thank you a lot