View Full Version : enlarger light????
does cold light produce a different contact print than that regular little light bulb in the condensor head?
N Dhananjay
6-Jun-1999, 12:23
hi don't think it should. the callier effect (higher densities of silver deposit scattering the light more) is more of an issue in enlargements. i used to make contact prints with a regular lamp (but in a shrouded desk lamp, not in a condensor head). i suppose that technically there probably is a difference but i've never spotted it. i could see it in enlargements. i guess this is because in a contact print, the scattered light can only deviate a smaller amount (since the space where it can deviate is only the thickness of the emulsion) but in a an enlargement, it travels a longer distance and the deviations are thus more severe. hope this helps. dj
Tony Brent
8-Jun-1999, 01:42
The other gentleman's answer explains what is meant when describing a cold light source as giving "contact print quality." A print from a properly calibrated cold light enlarger will be very close to a contact print of the neg -- especially in the lighter tones. A print from a condenser enlarger will show some loss of highlight detail. Finding the right development for your negatives, under your own conditions, so they do print like a good contact print is basically what the Zone system is all about.
Steve Singleton
10-Jun-1999, 21:27
As previous answers suggest, the quality of a contact print itself shouldn't be much, if any, differnt due to the enlarger light source. Cold light and condenser enlargers, however, do require different B & W negative development times to deliver a "normal" contrast print--as I remember about minus 15% for condenser enlargement (Last I knew, Kodak's published development times assumed diffusion rather than condensor). So even if the contact appears no different, it will still pay to adjust development to suit the light source.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.