Ilford Delta 100 Sheet Film, Observations Please

[Greg Y]

I just bought into the Delta 100 5x7 sale....100 sheet boxes at a good price. My usual films are FP4+, TriX, or TMY2. My lenses are Dagors & G Clarons. The last time I used Delta 100 was about 15 yrs ago...in 35mm. My usual film developer is Pyrocat HD. I print with a color head Durst 138 and develop in Formulary 130, or Amidol (contact prints). I'd appreciate some comments .....your impressions from using Delta 100 characteristics etc...
development range etc. Thanks

[Gem Singer]

When I tried Ilford Delta 100, a few years ago, I found it to be very similar to Kodak T-Max100.

I'm not a fan of fabricated grain films.

[Greg Y]

Thanks GemS, Any comments by folks who do use Delta 100 & like it?

[mdm]

I love it. Very smooth and easy to use, it has a special look. My favourite by a long way.

73987

73988

[Doug Howk]

I'm also curious since I've also placed a ULF order for the Delta 100 5X7. I currently use FP4 & TriX 320 in this size; and contact print pt/pd as well as some Collodion POP. Are there advantages in Delta 100 for contact printing?

[IanG]

i use it in 120 and 5x4 and it's a superb film, it's an excellent replacement for APX100 and Tmax100 which were my main films for many years before the first was discontinued and the second became difficult to find (in some parts of the world).

Ian

[mdm]

It is fine for contact printing. I dont know if there is any advantage over fp4 or trix but I like it the most of those three for contact and scanning. Maybe it does not develop the density of fp4, but it develops enough quickly enough in pyrocat 2:2:100 for me to make carbon transfers on high contrast tissue with 2% ammonium dichromate mostly.

[Lynn Jones]

I've used it for many years in all formats, I shoot it at ASA/ISO 64, usually prefer Rodinal 1:50 or 1:25, occasionally HC110B, or D76.straight or 1:1. I find that I get barely perceptible grain at 18 diameters of enlargement

Lynn

[Robert Skeoch]

I use it in 8x10, and 5x7 and even had a special run of 4x10 done last year.
I use it in ID-11 1:3 in a rotary drum.
I'm making enlargements though.
I use it at ISO 32 on very contrasty days and dial the development time way back.
On cloudy/overcast days I use it at 64.

Sorry I can't comment on the contacts idea, I only use the contacts for negative storage, not as final prints.

Overall I would say it's a wonderful film.

[Greg Y]

Thanks Everyone. I'm looking forward to giving it a try as my stock of other films dwindles. The bonus is the 100 sheet boxes as left overs.

[Joseph Dickerson]

Greg,

If you haven't worked with T grain films before, the T-Max and Delta families are both tabular grained films, be advised that they require a bit more care in processing than you might be used to. They all have very little tolerance for processing variables such as time, temperature, dilution, and, as far as I know, water quality (PH). For example, temperature should be within plus/minus 1/2 degree F. Not the plus/minus 2 degrees F that most B&W darkroom folks recommend. I also mix my developer(s) with distilled water just to eliminate one more variable.

If I remember correctly there is an excellent article by John Sexton on T-Max films in the archives. A lot of the information should apply to Delta films as well.

Just standardize your processing and you should be fine. I use Rodinol with T-Max films, but with Kodak's issues of late, I'm going to do some testing on Delta films just in case. :confused:

JD

[mdm]

You are over thinking it. I tray develop it by inspection with IR viewer, for an unknown time in Pyrocat 2:2:100 at an unknown temperature, probably about 25 C, and it comes out spot on every time. I just print with the same tissue and contrast every time and maybe 1 in 3 negatives needs a minor change in contrast if I want a final print, and that is due to exposure not development. Negatives scan fine too. Its important not to underexpose it though, for alt printing, but thin negatives scan well. Seems to love exposure. Its bulletproof. Better than FP4.

[Drew Wiley]

Other than tabular grain, about the only thing it has in common with TMax 100 is that it's
a slick film very prone to Newton rings. I'd recommend AN glass on the base side of the film
for either enlargment or contact printing. You either like this film or you don't. I didn't find
it particularly versatile given the lighting ratios I typically enounter. Favors the highlights
and upper midtones at the expense of shadow separation, even if you rate is down around
50. TMX on the other hand is pretty steep in the lower part of the curve, and the one thing you don't want to do with it is overexpose. Totally different animals.

[Greg Y]

Thanks everyone. I'll look forward to doing some testing. All in all it sounds like a film that will work out well. I've used Delta in the long past in 35 & Kodak's TMY-2 lately....so I don't think there will be too much adjustment to be made on my part.
The prints will tell the real story...

[John Conway]

I just picked up my Delta 4x5 100 contact sheets from the lab. This past weekend I photographed a friends barn that he completely restored. I told him I needed to photograph the barn in black and white before he paints it red. The results are beautiful. I'm in love with Delta 100. My CC402 and Super Angulon 121 with yellow filter performed flawlessly. I'm so happy with the results since there is not a single thing that could be done at the printing stage that would improve the images. It was early afternoon sun and I metered off the barn boards through my yellow filter. The film handled everything well with nice snappy contrast and perfect detail in the shadows. Oh, I must mention that the 121 SA, with it's great coverage, is a gem for this type of work since I cranked the front standard all the way up. I am stocking up on Delta 100.I'm having a 16X20 made and can't wait to get the print.

[John Conway]

Here is my barn image on Delta 100. It may be a little fuzzy. I copied the contact sheet with my Nikon D40. Just wanted to share the nice results I got with the film.


http://i46.tinypic.com/2ln7spv.jpg