Ed Richards
27-Apr-2012, 18:12
I am thinking about some serious church architectural photography. This will include a lot of wide angle work because of the height of the interiors, and the lack of step back room for the exteriors. I have a nice F2, which I have been happy when I do not have to hike with it. But there are nice Sinar X cameras for reasonable prices and I am curious what the comparison is in actual architectural work. I can see advantages for studio work, especially table top work. I could see where geared rise could be very nice - it is pretty hard to do rise on the F2 while you are watching the GG.
Any real advantages for this work, or am I just suffering from GAS. (The X and P2 cameras are such nice machinery.)
Any real advantages for this work, or am I just suffering from GAS. (The X and P2 cameras are such nice machinery.)