PDA

View Full Version : A suggestion to forum appearance



Severi Salminen
16-Oct-2003, 16:18
Now the author of a thread is displayed immediately after the subject line. It would be much better to have a separate column for subject and author.

(I'm refering to http://largeformatphotography.info/lfforum/)

tim atherton
16-Oct-2003, 16:31
Pleassssse don't start messing with things too much - it works just fine, looks pretty much like it did before. It's easy to read. If it ain't broke don't try and fix it - it will just break something else!

Jim Rice
16-Oct-2003, 16:41
I agree with Tim.

Capocheny
16-Oct-2003, 16:50
I'll "third" Tim's comment...

Cheers

David A. Goldfarb
16-Oct-2003, 17:33
I also prefer this format. Columns take up too much screen space.

Alex Batchinski
16-Oct-2003, 18:44
I agree, don't change.

Sal Santamaura
16-Oct-2003, 20:16
Another "vote" for the long awaited, much beloved, very readable status quo!

Michael J. Kravit
16-Oct-2003, 20:22
Dear I say...."Don't change a thing". This ain't Photo.Net. Let's keep it that way.

Ron Bose
16-Oct-2003, 21:50
I second Mike !!!

Robert C. McColloch
16-Oct-2003, 22:57
The format and organization of the forum is great. I would vote to leave it alone.

Jon_2416
17-Oct-2003, 01:34
>Now the author of a thread is displayed immediately after the subject line. It >would be much better to have a separate column for subject and author.

I'm with Severi. I'd be happy just if the subject/author line didn't wrap. Maybe make the title field accept more characters. There is a lot of space on the other side of the Posted/Last Reply area.

>Dear I say...."Don't change a thing". This ain't Photo.Net. Let's keep it that way.

>--Mike Kravit, 2003-10-16 19:22:11

Dear (Dare) I say too... Photo.net's latest change is lame. It makes no sense. However, I think this change does.

Henry Ambrose
17-Oct-2003, 07:59
Its great just the way it is. My $.02

Michael J. Kravit
17-Oct-2003, 17:26
Now I feel bad.....how "dare" I make such a daring error in my dear old spelling procedure. Shame on me. ;-)