lbenac
29-Nov-2011, 20:30
So far I have been running two sets of lenese in parallel based on weight ans taste for my lanscape photography
1) HEAVY
Nikkor-SW75/4.5, Nikkor-SW 90/8, Fuji-NW 125/5.6, Nikkot-W 180/5.6 (plasmat) and Nikkor-M 300/9 (Tessar)
2) LIGHT
Angulon 90/6.8, Xenar 150/5.6 and Xenar 210/6.1 (tessar)
I just won a bid for a Nikkor 200/8 (Tessar) that I have been looking for for some time :p .
I feel that it gives the chance to simply streamline the two lines into one with taking the Angulon for hiking and the Nikkor otherwise.
So what I have now in mind is reduce all my lenses to:
Nikkor-SW 90/8
A good and small 135mm i.e Sirona-S, Sironar/Caltar-N, Fuji-NW 135/5.6
Nikkor-M 200/8
Nikkor-M 300/9
For hiking I will simply take the Angulon 90/6.8 and leave the Nikkor-SW at home. Or leave both 90-SW and 135 at home in favour of 125/200/300
As this means quite a bit of trading or selling of lenses, any comments suggestions on that strategies?
Cheers,
Luc
1) HEAVY
Nikkor-SW75/4.5, Nikkor-SW 90/8, Fuji-NW 125/5.6, Nikkot-W 180/5.6 (plasmat) and Nikkor-M 300/9 (Tessar)
2) LIGHT
Angulon 90/6.8, Xenar 150/5.6 and Xenar 210/6.1 (tessar)
I just won a bid for a Nikkor 200/8 (Tessar) that I have been looking for for some time :p .
I feel that it gives the chance to simply streamline the two lines into one with taking the Angulon for hiking and the Nikkor otherwise.
So what I have now in mind is reduce all my lenses to:
Nikkor-SW 90/8
A good and small 135mm i.e Sirona-S, Sironar/Caltar-N, Fuji-NW 135/5.6
Nikkor-M 200/8
Nikkor-M 300/9
For hiking I will simply take the Angulon 90/6.8 and leave the Nikkor-SW at home. Or leave both 90-SW and 135 at home in favour of 125/200/300
As this means quite a bit of trading or selling of lenses, any comments suggestions on that strategies?
Cheers,
Luc