PDA

View Full Version : Getting back into film and LF - howdy from Georgia



Roger Cole
23-Jan-2011, 23:12
Hi all. I became involved in photography in high school back in the late 70s and early 80s and shot 35mm and did darkroom work through college and somewhat after. I always wanted to get into LF but between the camera and darkroom gear (the big honkin' enlarger, which wasn't a give away item back then) I didn't and finally let photography slide some time in the late 80s. Some years later in the mid to late 90s I got back into photography and got a Linhof Technika III with three lenses, some film holders and other accessories, an Omega DIIV enlarger, and went at things really intensely for a while.

Career changes and digital came along and I haven't shot any LF (and hardly any 35mm film) since about 2003 or so, but I kept all my gear.

This past summer I started dating a remarkable lady that, amongst her other charms, is absolutely passionate about art, pretty much any art. I showed her some of my old prints, the few I have hanging on the wall, and my photo gear and, well, let's say I've been inspired! ;) It really served to get me interested again. She's eager to attend the Cartier-Bresson exhibit coming to the High Museum here in Atlanta next month, too.

I lived in TN in the 90s and had built a darkroom in my parents basement. I've since moved to the Atlanta metro area. I have a large basement with plenty of room but it isn't built out yet or stubbed, but I can work with a holding bath for a while. I retrieved most of my darkroom gear (the stuff I think I need, which is most of it) from TN over the holidays and am excited to be gearing up to get back into photography in general and large format in particular.

I've just not been inspired by digital. I'm a network engineer by profession and work with computers (well, routers and switches) all the time. My darkroom will be my retreat from that into another time. Still, I'm not anti-tech exactly. I did some color printing in the old days, passably well but never really enjoyed it that much. I figure color is probably best handled digitally or at least with a hybrid approach, so I plan to shoot primarily black and white. I have a Jobo CPE2 and the 4x5 (whatever the number is, I forget, 2500?) reels, so I may do some E6, but if I do it will be with a mind to scan the transparencies and print digitally. It also occurs to me that this opens up the possibility of working in 8x10 without being limited to contact prints or needing an enlarger that, while often free now, would be about as bulky as a sub compact car! But for the foreseeable future it's going to be 4x5 and 35mm, and probably some MF. I'm planning to pick up some MF gear and maybe a roll film back.

I did pick up a Pentax LX for 35mm (I had K mount lenses, and always wanted one of these back in the day) and went a bit berserk "commemorating" the end of Kodachrome, shooting a total of 15 rolls, of which I'm waiting for the last three back from Dwyane's.

My Technika III has seen better days, with a stripped focusing rail that is still workable by positioning the lens standard wherever you need ;) and some other broken bits that don't impair function, and a bellows that needs some more electrical tape, so I suspect I will replace it before too long. I'm looking over the available choices but don't want to jump into anything until I've used the old camera a bit to get a better idea of how my shooting style may change after this long lay off.

Oh yes, my other expensive hobby is flying. I earned my private pilot license in 2008, after a lifelong dream and an aborted attempt that ran out of money back in college. There are many great things about flying as a private pilot, but one seldom appreciated is that, after aviation, the cost of any other hobby gets an entirely different perspective! :D Even LF gear seems downright cheap in comparison! So now I get to balance out the desire to buy into an airplane partnership with the desire for all the cool photo toys I want!

Brian C. Miller
23-Jan-2011, 23:28
Welcome, Roger! Remember to do some photography from the air, too!

Roger Cole
24-Jan-2011, 04:35
Thanks Brian. I've shot a fair amount of digital from the air, and 35mm would certainly be doable, maybe MF with the right rig, but I don't think I'm up to LF while flying! My Technika has long ago had the rangefinder removed so it's just a view camera. Humm, maybe one that had a rangefinder and cam... ;)

Vick Vickery
24-Jan-2011, 08:39
Welcome to group therapy, Roger! :) And welcome back to photography.

Jim Michael
24-Jan-2011, 09:12
Hi Roger. Another pilot here - Stinson 108-3 and Beech Sundowner.

Roger Cole
24-Jan-2011, 09:27
Hi Roger. Another pilot here - Stinson 108-3 and Beech Sundowner.

Hi Jim. Which airport do you fly from? Since I live in Lawrenceville I fly from LZU.

Jim Michael
24-Jan-2011, 10:19
The Stinson is down at Tara Field (4A7) and the Sundowner is at PDK.

John Kasaian
24-Jan-2011, 21:17
Hello Roger!
I'm an ex Supercub driver & 8x10 shooter. Welcome and post often!:D

Roger Cole
24-Jan-2011, 21:39
Hello Roger!
I'm an ex Supercub driver & 8x10 shooter. Welcome and post often!:D

Shouldn't be a problem. I'm to 10,700 posts and counting on the Purple Board for Pilots. :o (Google finds it easily if any other pilots are interested.)

Harold_4074
28-Mar-2011, 18:34
Roger,

Regarding the size of 8x10 enlargers: if you get a chance, pick up a decent 8x10 camera and see how long it is before you feel like you really have to have an enlarger. I am up to three 8x10s of various ilk, and actually have an 8x10 enlarger, but haven't found the need to put it into operation yet.

Welcome to the forum, from an ole Georgia boy (born in Augusta so very long ago)!

Roger Cole
28-Mar-2011, 19:54
Hi Harold, and thanks for the welcome.

I don't necessarily think I have to have one in the sense of wanting to print bigger than 8x10, but it does add a lot of versatility. In any case, I'll consider that once I get the darkroom going and upgrade the 4x5.

Sascha Welter
29-Mar-2011, 04:38
Welcome!

I don't think you'd need to have a rangefinder when taking pictures from a plane. Finding the hyperfocal distance for the lens should be enough.

Harold_4074
29-Mar-2011, 10:07
Yep--one of the virtues of contact-printing 8x10 negatives (apart from the marvelous tonality) is the discipline that it enforces with respect to composition. One of its vices, on the other hand, is that a poorly framed but otherwise worthy image can only be redeemed by cropping or reshooting....sort of like chastity; its own reward and its own punishment :)

Much as I like the 16x20 and 20x24 prints, I know that it takes a lot of space to display them to advantage, and enlarging an 8x10 negative to 11x14 seems marginally worth doing. This is why we have 11x14 cameras, I suppose!

Roger Cole
29-Mar-2011, 17:58
Welcome!

I don't think you'd need to have a rangefinder when taking pictures from a plane. Finding the hyperfocal distance for the lens should be enough.

That's a good point, or just find infinity for a given lens and set it there, assuming you didn't need parts of the wing or the like in the scene.

But on the other hand, it just seems better suited to digital or 35mm. As I said, I've shot quite a bit of digital from the air. I think when I get time I will shovel some of those onto my Flickr page (which still needs serious updating - I have on there now a total of two LF images, plus a tiny fraction of the Kodachrome I shot over 2010.)


Yep--one of the virtues of contact-printing 8x10 negatives (apart from the marvelous tonality) is the discipline that it enforces with respect to composition. One of its vices, on the other hand, is that a poorly framed but otherwise worthy image can only be redeemed by cropping or reshooting....sort of like chastity; its own reward and its own punishment :)

Much as I like the 16x20 and 20x24 prints, I know that it takes a lot of space to display them to advantage, and enlarging an 8x10 negative to 11x14 seems marginally worth doing. This is why we have 11x14 cameras, I suppose!

Good points. I typically print 8x10 and 11x14, occasionally 5x7 but the latter mainly from 35mm when highly pushed. 5x7 enlargers are a lot more reasonably sized, but film availability stinks.

In any case, I'll be happy to get back into 35, MF and 4x5 now. I picked up a Yashica Mat for 6x6 and a rollfilm back in 6x7, the latter mainly for color for the much better film availability and affordability more than anything. So I have plenty to play with for a while.

Diane Maher
30-Mar-2011, 09:21
Welcome Roger! I am not a pilot, but I do shoot 8x10, 5x12 (inches) and whole plate (6½ x 8½ inches). I do mostly pt/pd printing as I have no darkroom. I have an 8x10 enlarger out in the shed that I'm not using. It's on the "hope to use at some future time" list.

Diane