Fuji at PMA

[Ed Richards]

Ken Rockwell has a nice shot of the Fuji booths on his site. He reports that the huge display prints were all done from 8x10, including one from 4 stitched 8x10! (About a year ago Ken became a film true believer and has been pushing film use and film cameras on his site.)

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/pma/2010/index.htm

[Dirk Rösler]

You have to give it to Ken, there just aren't many sites out there that match his level of enthusiasm. Which sometimes is all that matters.

Thanks for the link.

[gainer]

The prints at the fuji booth were exceptionally well done compared to most of the over-enlarged stuff found elsewhere at PMA! It was the only booth that my companion and I stopped to look at photographs instead of at equipment. The photographer is Rodney Lough Jr.

[Allen in Montreal]

So Fuji announces a new GF 6x7/6x6 film camera,
and then pulls the plug on Neopan 400 in 120 roll format?
Their management team seems about as wise :mad: as Kodak's!

[Songyun]

So Fuji announces a new GF 6x7/6x6 film camera,
and then pulls the plug on Neopan 400 in 120 roll format?
Their management team seems about as wise :mad: as Kodak's!

That's exactly what I want to say! :mad: :mad:
If I am going to buy a Fuji 670, NEOPAN 400 will be my main film to shoot with. I really don't understand. Maybe Fuji670 should fall in the category of Nikon F6.

[Renato Tonelli]

The B&W availability in 220 is also annoying. Once my supply of 320TXP runs out, it's back to 120 only - a minor inconvenience, but an inconvenience nonetheless.

[Robert Hughes]

Unimpressed. $2400 for a fifty year old camera design? I bet it takes pretty pictures, but I could buy a bunch of Agfa Isolettes and film for that kinda scratch.

But I don't need to - I've already got one, fixed up by Certo6 and loaded with HP5+. It's in my jacket pocket right now...