PDA

View Full Version : Portrait Film Recommendation Please



Pawlowski6132
18-Oct-2009, 14:12
So, I'm trying to start my study on the best portrait film for me but was hoping to start with a short list. The constraints are:



4x5
Studio Strobes
210mm Lens


That's about it. I would also like to find a developer that's simple enought to make myself.

My style preference is relatively dramatic and contrasty.

If anyone has had great success and would like to share, I'd love to know:


Film
EI
Best Exposure Levels
Developer and Developing Details
Anything else that made your final print its best


Thank you very much in advance for reading this thread and your contributions.

Joe

Ron Marshall
18-Oct-2009, 14:43
Lots of great choices: FP4, TXP, TMY.

If you don't need the extra two stops, go for the FP4.

Pawlowski6132
18-Oct-2009, 15:05
Lots of great choices: FP4, TXP, TMY.

If you don't need the extra two stops, go for the FP4.

Hmmm, I would have expected something in the 25-50 ISO range.

Ari
18-Oct-2009, 15:13
Shanghai film; 100 ISO, EI of about 80 and process in HC-110, 20˚C for 7,5 minutes.
Very nice portrait film and you can play around with it to get a nice range of contrasts.
Plus, it's one of the lowest-priced films available.

Armin Seeholzer
18-Oct-2009, 15:50
TMAX 100 if you like it contrasty use it at 100 or 125 ASA and you get good contrasty and very sharp results, with almost any developer!

Cheers Armin

jp
18-Oct-2009, 18:09
I'd use TMY with an extra minute or so in the developer for what you're asking for some extra contrast. You could also shoot it without abnormal contrast and control the contrast result purely through the printing filtration/grade.

jnantz
18-Oct-2009, 20:33
xxx

Anthony Lewis
18-Oct-2009, 20:47
Remember you will be shooting at a least F8, if not higher. The fastest modern lenses are around 5.6 and you will want to stop down at least one stop. Outdoors in average overcast conditions, on 100ASA film you are down to about 1/15 at f8 - f11, taking into consideration bellows extension of losing 1 stop (I go for pretty tight head shots). I think to make life easy on yourself you need 100 asa film for outdoors.

If you are shooting under lights, I feel 400 asa is essential, unless you have strobes, flash, or lots of soft light. I use continuous floro lighting for indoor portraits, and 400 asa is essential, ie, Porta 400 for colour or HP5 for B&W.

Ron Marshall
18-Oct-2009, 21:13
Hmmm, I would have expected something in the 25-50 ISO range.

Why would you expect that?

Pawlowski6132
18-Oct-2009, 21:27
Why would you expect that?

In my 35mm world, I usually try to shoot portraits with as little grain as possible. Plus, under controlled lighting, I don't need fast films so, why would I, or anyone, want to shoot with a higher grain film than they have to?

Ron Marshall
18-Oct-2009, 21:45
In my 35mm world, I usually try to shoot portraits with as little grain as possible. Plus, under controlled lighting, I don't need fast films so, why would I, or anyone, want to shoot with a higher grain film than they have to?

With 4x5, and a film such as TMX, or perhaps even TMY grain will not be obtrusive.

The problem with 4x5 compared to 35mm is smaller apertures, unless you plan to shoot wide open. Regardless of the aperture, you will need four times the strobe output for a 25 ISO film than for a 100 ISO film. That may get pricey depending on your lighting set-up.

Gary L. Quay
19-Oct-2009, 00:18
Your depth of field with 4x5 is narrower than 35mm, even at the same apertures. I have shot portraits with slow films, but it's a bit tricky. When I use slower films, I couple it with a soft focus lens to give it a creamy appearance, because I have to open the lens up quite a bit. I would be interested to know the model and power of your strobes. My Power Lights at 750 watts give me almost a full stop over my Speedotron setup at 800 watts. This is why I sold the Speedotron. With the Power Lights at 4 feet from the subject, I was able to shoot 400 speed Kodak Protra at F32. An ASA 25 film would take that to F8. You would see a noticable fall off in depth pf field. Add a yellow contrast filter, and you're almost at F4. I shouls mention that my set in the shoot I mentioned above was pure white, and I had 4 strobe units cooking away. Your results may vary.

If you shoot a film like FP4, and develop it in a fine grain developer, you won't likely notice the grain until the enlargement gets to 16x20. Xtol @ 1:1 gives good results. If you want higher contrast, try developing at N+1.

But, if you're still interested in a slow speed film that will deliver the contrast you're looking for, and don't mind the depth of field issue, I suggest Adox ORT 25. The orthographic emulsion handles portraiture very well. Some normal contrast developers will give it high contrast, and some won't. I used my last few packs of Kodak Technidol, a soft contrast developer, on a 120 roll of it a few weeks ago and was pleasantly surprised by the punch the images still had. The emulsion is very soft. Handle it with extreme care.

--Gary

Frank Petronio
19-Oct-2009, 04:42
It really depends on the amount of depth of field you are after, for most practical enlargements ISO 400 film will look fine. Many of the finest, fussy, anal-retentive large format landscape photographers have and still do use TXP (Tri-X) and TMY (400) and they certainly are not notable for being "grainy".

You'll also see flesh tones move up and down the scale based on the type of film. But the major brands - Kodak TXP, TMY, TMX and Ilford FP4, HP5 render the same flesh within half a stop of each other and can filtered if desired.

In general, idiot incompetent photographers such as myself stick to one kind of B&W film out of the desire to keep some consistency to their images and just to keep the process as simple as possible.

I use Kodak TXP, I usually shoot nearly wide open, and I like hard lighting but my lighting varies quite a bit. When I do the rare executive portrait traditional commercial stuff with strobes I'll shoot at f/16 with a longer 210mm - 300mm lens (whatever I have at the time, it doesn't really matter). Good old boring Tri-X is versatile and its speed and latitude can help me out in tricky situations.

If I shot some obscure Eastern European ISO 50 film I'd have to carry a lot more lighting gear and be a lot fussier with the process, buy more in advance, and generally have a pain in the ass for very little difference in my end results, not necessarily for the better either. Sometimes a little grain is good for a photo, helping make transitions smoother, etc.

erie patsellis
19-Oct-2009, 07:25
My preference, when contrast isn't out of hand is TXP, exposed and processed carefully, there's no grain to speak of at normal viewing distances in a full frame 16x20.

David Luttmann
19-Oct-2009, 08:02
In my 35mm world, I usually try to shoot portraits with as little grain as possible. Plus, under controlled lighting, I don't need fast films so, why would I, or anyone, want to shoot with a higher grain film than they have to?

With TMax film, you won't have any grain even out to 32x40. I'm not sure how big you wish to print, but grain free 40" is as big as I ever get.

Don Hutton
19-Oct-2009, 08:10
TMY is very fast which is a great help when shooting LF portraiture. It's also very fine grained... I shoot 35mm portraiture with it all the time.

Roger Vadim
20-Oct-2009, 08:01
Tri-x 320

Rate it at 320. Cook in A-49 (Atomal). Great subtle skin tones. The classic portrait film (think of Avedon)

Me personally also likes Foma 100, but this is rather a EI 50 film - means really a LOT of strobes. Nice old school look under northern sky. It really is all about what look you want. go and find out for yourself. Its fun!

David Karp
20-Oct-2009, 09:01
I have done few portraits, but I really like the look of some I did using Arista.Edu Ultra 200 from Freestyle. This is the same film as Fomapan 200.

William McEwen
20-Oct-2009, 13:35
Kodak Tri-X. YUM.

r.e.
20-Oct-2009, 15:09
Right now, my favourite for 5x7 is HP5+ because B+H had it in stock. I wanted Delta 100, but as the nice man at B+H explained, I would have to order 45 boxes. I was looking at their web site while we were talking on the phone, and sure enough, there was this little box under Delta referring to a 45 box minimum order :)

Is anybody offering workshops at some esoteric locale in how to cut down 8X10 film? Or better yet, how to stretch 4x5?

Ron Marshall
20-Oct-2009, 15:29
Right now, my favourite for 5x7 is HP5+ because B+H had it in stock. I wanted Delta 100, but as the nice man at B+H explained, I would have to order 45 boxes. I was looking at their web site while we were talking on the phone, and sure enough, there was this little box under Delta referring to a 45 box minimum order :)



Freestyle has Delta 100 in 100 sheet boxes for $143!

http://www.freestylephoto.biz/1965489-Ilford-Delta-Pro-100-iso-5x7-100-sheets?cat_id=404

r.e.
20-Oct-2009, 15:37
Now you tell me.

Pawlowski6132
21-Oct-2009, 06:41
Ok, so, for all of you on the edge of your seat; right or wrong, I made a strategic decision to commit to TMX for the next 6mos. It's the fastest B/W film that Kodak currently makes in 35mm roll, 120 and sheet which, I want.

I'm leaning towards Xtol or D-76 for normal or 1-stop push exposure. Any recommendations?

thanx

Frank Petronio
21-Oct-2009, 07:00
Haha yeah I was nervous. So Kodak stopped selling iso 320/400 TXP and TMY in 35/120/sheet???!!!

Yikes!

Ron Marshall
21-Oct-2009, 07:28
Ok, so, for all of you on the edge of your seat; right or wrong, I made a strategic decision to commit to TMX for the next 6mos. It's the fastest B/W film that Kodak currently makes in 35mm roll, 120 and sheet which, I want.

I'm leaning towards Xtol or D-76 for normal or 1-stop push exposure. Any recommendations?

thanx

Both good developers, I prefer Xtol see Kodak's chart (attached). Xtol is also easier to mix than D76.

Gary L. Quay
21-Oct-2009, 08:11
I've been experimenting with Xtol for the past few weeks, and I like the results better than D76. So Far.

--Gary

Keith Tapscott.
21-Oct-2009, 10:29
Old recommendations for portraiture was to use a soft-gradation panchromatic film which is free from excessive sensitivity to red which can cause undesirable pale and chalky skin-tones.

For the latest films available, something like Ilford HP5 Plus or Kodak TMY2 should be suitable.
For film development, you wont go far wrong with D-76/ID-11 or Xtol.

B&W portrait papers tended to have a warm-tone such as Agfa Portriga, Kodak Royal-Bromesko and Kodak Ektalure. The nearest to those today is probably Ilford MG-WT, Fomatone-MG or Emaks. I like Ilford Galerie.