PDA

View Full Version : ULF Tripod Options



Blumine
3-Jul-2009, 22:14
I had pretty much settled upon a large Berlebach UNI series tripod for my new (to me) Korona 11x14. Then I started thinking about the weight of all this stuff. I dont have a scale here, but my guess is the Korona, lens and film holder are close to 20 pounds, add that to 15+ pounds of tripod and 3 pounds of Arca B2 ball head and its getting really heavy very fast.

So here I am back to ground zero, pondering if I should just buy a big old Gitzo Carbon like a GT5541LS. The price is not much higher than a Ries, though it s more than a Berlebach. But the weight is about half, my only concern is how good a job is does of dampening vibration versus one of the wooden tripods.

Any thoughts?

Thanks.

Blumine

Kirk Fry
3-Jul-2009, 22:32
Seem to me by the time it gets that heavy the weight is not an issue. You aren't going to be all that far from the car/truck. A good majestic tripod with the geared aircraft carrier platform head would work great. Mine is only 19 lb. One way to eliminate the weight of the head is to not use one. Read what Mr. Ritter has to say about this method of weight saving. Of course using one his cameras would shave off more weight. KFry

Mark Sawyer
3-Jul-2009, 23:07
I use a Ries with my 11x14 B&J, which outweighs the Korona, with no complaints. I think the Ries is wonderfully practical and aesthetically beautiful, especially under an old wooden camera...

Jim Fitzgerald
4-Jul-2009, 09:35
I use my hand made Walnut tripod with a Gitzo 1570M low profile head and I love it. My Walnut 11x14 sits on top and the camera is 16lbs and the tripod with the head is 12lbs. I put the camera in a backpack and carry the tripod and I'm good to go. Not light and I don't hike as far as I used to but I can still go a few miles with it at altitude.

Jim

Jason Greenberg Motamedi
4-Jul-2009, 10:09
I can put my 8x10 and 300-series Gitzo tripod over my shoulder and easily walk, but there is no way I can do this with my 11x14. My very big sturdy tripod was bought at a yard sale with a 35mm movie camera from the 1950s ($25!). The head alone weighs more than my 11x14. While it is incredibly solid (I can easily stand on the tripod), the weight makes it difficult to move the camera at all, and I often take the camera off the tripod just to move it across the yard. For this reason I think keeping the weight down is important. If I were going to use my 11x14 outside of my house or studio (which I don't) I would seriously consider a carbon fiber tripod.

David Carson
4-Jul-2009, 18:42
I agree with the previous post...the weight of your gear pretty much negates worrying about tripod weight. People have suggested using a 3-wheeled baby stroller, the big spoked wheel kind, for moving heavy gear. I bought a Ries J 100-2 with a custom extra-long legs after my Hassy almost blew over. It was on a lightweight metal tripod.

Obviously a Ries is not a tripod that I would want to carry on my back. But with your giant sail of a camera, I'd want a giant tripod.

The BIG overlooked advantage of the Ries over any other tripod I know is the design of the leg lock down, which is part of the crown assembly. It forms a triangle of sorts with the leg pivot, which GREATLY stiffens the whole thing through mechanical advantage. Look here (http://riestripod.com/tripics.htm#tri2) to see what I'm talking about. There's no bump stop to flex around (gitzo and most other brands) or a simple squeezing tightener on the pivot (like on the Uni) to lock it down. Once you tighten the lug, it ain't moving.

However, I suppose if you also want to use the tripod for hiking with lighter gear, you could get the CF and weigh it down with sand/rocks with one of those bags that attach underneath. But if weight is no concern, the Ries is king.

Jim Fitzgerald
4-Jul-2009, 20:22
You can always build the same thing. I did just that for my 8x20 tripod. I modified the tri-lock system for my Walnut tripod. I had to build it out of Walnut. It works like a charm and is very solid.

Jim

Archphoto
5-Jul-2009, 06:31
Jim, it shure looks good, please place a some more pictures so we all can ....... over what you made.

On my shoppinglist: more, more Brazil Wood: first for the camera, then for the tripod.......

And you are completely right: if you have a beautifull wooden camera a wooden tripod belongs to it !

Peter

boris
5-Jul-2009, 07:44
"There's no bump stop to flex around (gitzo and most other brands) or a simple squeezing tightener on the pivot (like on the Uni) to lock it down"

with the older berlebach uni you use a chain! the angel of the legspread is adjustable. it's a very straightforward solution. weightless indestructable simpel.
cheers, boris

cjbroadbent
5-Jul-2009, 10:41
Once more into the fray. If you shoot level, get a real used video tripod with leg braces and cup and half sphere leveling and just add a pan plate. Arri does it in wood, Vinten in carbon and Manfrotto in alu.

Jim Fitzgerald
5-Jul-2009, 11:17
Jim, it shure looks good, please place a some more pictures so we all can ....... over what you made.

On my shoppinglist: more, more Brazil Wood: first for the camera, then for the tripod.......

And you are completely right: if you have a beautifull wooden camera a wooden tripod belongs to it !

Peter

Peter, here is a couple more. I had some of the nice folks on here send me some close up images of the cam lock system and I just made it the best I could out of Walnut. It is not the best looking but it sure does lock the tripod down tight. This is the one I use for my 8x20. I still need to get a better connection from the yolk to the Majestic head. I'll get that figured out eventually.

Jim Fitzgerald
5-Jul-2009, 11:31
Almost forgot this one. I thought I had a shot of the tripod I built for the 11x14. Yes I'm nuts, I have dedicated Walnut tripods for each one of my ULF cameras. What the hell, ignore my ugly mug and check out the camera and tripod. You can not have a nice wooden camera on anything but a wooden tripod! But I am prejudice I guess!
Tripods are not that hard to build. The 11x14 has the Gitzo head and is about 12 lbs. Not lightweight but very, very sturdy. I did change the design a bit and I eliminated the cam lock on this one.

Jim

Blumine
7-Jul-2009, 17:30
Thanks for the advice. A Ries would be first choice, but a Berlebach Uni with a chain would be a much cheaper alternative(ie more money for film, pt/pd supplies).

Though they look really nice, there is no way I could make a tripod, my wood working skills are little, none and zilch.

I need to sleep on this for a couple of days then make up my mind. This Korona is crying for use, but can't do that until I get something to put it on.

Blumine

alec4444
7-Jul-2009, 19:17
If you have any vision of shooting in windy / otherwise inclimate weather, then go with the heavier tripod. My 30 pound 11x14 Wisner is absolutely still in 30mph wind when anchored to my Ries A100 with the A250 tilt head. A few times, that's been useful. But if you don't plan on shooting that way, go as light as you can!

--A

Blumine
7-Jul-2009, 19:27
If you have any vision of shooting in windy / otherwise inclimate weather, then go with the heavier tripod. My 30 pound 11x14 Wisner is absolutely still in 30mph wind when anchored to my Ries A100 with the A250 tilt head. A few times, that's been useful. But if you don't plan on shooting that way, go as light as you can!

--A

Alec,

If I may ask which Ries A100 do you have, the plain old A100 or the A100-2?

Thanks for the reply.

Blumine