View Full Version : Manfrotto MA 117 suitable for 8x10 Sinar P?
Shutter
27-Dec-2008, 15:07
Hi there,
I was looking for a tripod for my (hopefully soon arriving) Sinar P 8x10" and stumbled across the Manfrotto 117B.
I know it's acutally a video tripod but as it has a load capacity of 39.68 lbs/18kg I assume it would be strong enough for the Sinar, and it's quite reasonably priced, about 150$ less than the 058 and quite a bit sturdier...
Does anyone have experience with this tripod?
(http://www.manfrotto.com/Jahia/site/manfrotto/cache/offonce/pid/3319?livid=68&lsf=68&child=1)
cjbroadbent
28-Dec-2008, 13:10
You might do better with the Manfrotto video tripod that does not have a central column but has a cup and ball leveling base. I use one of them indoors for 8x10 (The leg braces and add-on rubber feet make for stability) and a similar carbon Viglen video tripod for all formats outdoors. Both tripods are light because there is no central column and no head - other than a pan plate (You may rarely need to point the camera uphill or downdale).
Shutter
29-Dec-2008, 10:07
I was thinking about a ball base tripod but it just wouldn't be as flexible, I need to use it mainly in a studio for portraits and still life....so pointing it up and down is very important.
Anyway, I guess I'll give it a try, seems to me that nobody knows this tripod (at least not with LF)
cjbroadbent
29-Dec-2008, 10:25
... I need to use it mainly in a studio for portraits and still life....Beware vibrations with an 8x10 on the end of a vertical column. Whatever, good luck!
BennehBoy
31-Dec-2008, 04:57
See if you can pick up a Slik Professional 4, it's pretty much the same as a Gitzo series 4 but without the interchangeable collumns. Mine holds my 8x10 P2 steady as a rock and it is cheaper than an 058 (I got mine for 140GBP).
Shutter
31-Dec-2008, 11:00
I just took a look at the specs of the Silk Pro 4, it's about as heavy as the Manfrotto 117 but it'll only carry as much as the 058 (26lbs/12kg) compared to the 39,7lbs/18kg of the 117 and I don't think it's cheaper than that.
BennehBoy
1-Jan-2009, 06:08
Don't forget the ratings are for maximum extension, and the slik4 4 is 8 feet tall" it's absolutely rock solid without the final leg extensions out and my P2 + hood, holder, 300/5.6 sat atop.
You are right about that, but as I can't find it anywhere, neither at ebay not at any store in europe....well I guess I've made my choice, the 117 seems good enough :)
erie patsellis
6-Jan-2009, 22:05
If it's for studio use, find a nice studio stand, they aren't expensive on ebay and go a long way towards making your studio life easier. I have a Cambo UST I got cheap, and my only regret is not getting one sooner.
A studio stand would be the better choice but as I do not have my own studio yet, and I want to do some outdoor/location shots, I'll have to stick with tripods.
Well, today the tripod arrived, it's really big and very very solid, no problem with the Sinar even at ridiculous and extreme positions.
It's really a nice 'budget' tripod, carries a lot but won't empy your bank account, sure the weight is a considerable drawback if you are mainly into landscape photography "off the beaten track" but otherwise a really great deal.
Now I only need a decent lens (I guess an apo-ronar 480mm f9 will do fine) and some film holders... ;)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.