View Full Version : Fuji Velvia 100F vs. Velvia 100
tylercooney
23-Nov-2007, 15:48
What is the difference in these two films? Is Fuji Velvia 100F more highly saturated? If I am going to be shooting some portraits would 100 be better?
Tyler
eric black
23-Nov-2007, 16:17
I personally wouldnt shoot portraits with either- Id opt for Provia with a warming filter or Astia. But given the choice, 100 will provide a much better image in my opinion. 100F is not a great film-too unnaturally saturated for my taste.
Dave Parker
23-Nov-2007, 16:24
I always shot artwork with provia, velvia is to saturated in any flavor for doing artwork or portraits in my opinion.
Dave
Brian Vuillemenot
23-Nov-2007, 17:04
Of the two, 100 is more saturated and 100F would be better for portriats. However, as mentioned above, better alternatives exist for portraits.
steve simmons
23-Nov-2007, 17:14
What is the difference in these two films? Is Fuji Velvia 100F more highly saturated? If I am going to be shooting some portraits would 100 be better?
Tyler
View Camera did an article showing the diffeences for landscapes in our July issue.
steve simmons
www.viewcamera.com
tylercooney
23-Nov-2007, 18:25
Great thanks. I think instead of taking one of those I'll take four varieties and hope I like one of the four. Thanks for your input.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.