PDA

View Full Version : True? "Music is most direct path to spiritual world!?"



Robert McClure
16-Oct-2006, 07:02
I listened to an NPR interview with a French pianist recently. She said she believed, "music is the most direct path to the spiritual world." This struck me as, more or less, an absolute statement. I am inclined to conclude that music simply "works" for this pianist.

I would pose the following question to the forum:

Does the medium of photography, likewise, provide a "path" to the spiritual world?

The interview really stimulated my thinking. Is it true that music possesses unique power to the exclusion of other media?

Robert McClure

Ole Tjugen
16-Oct-2006, 07:14
To other musicians, yes.

To the tone-deaf, no. not at all.

N Dhananjay
16-Oct-2006, 07:25
I don't know about direct paths to spiritual worlds but... One way in which music is different from other media is that it was never saddled with the burden of representation or record-making. The visual arts certainly shouldered that and it took a long while to shake themselves free of that (perhaps self-imposed) burden. Any move away from representation alwys caused something of a furore - you don't have to look at abstraction, even impressionism was reviled quite a bit in it's day. Even after media like photography appeared on the scene, painting continued in its representational tradition for a long while. It could be argued that without photography, painting would have never been able to hake off the shackles of representation. Music, in contrast, never HAD to repreent something. There were certainly composers who looked to representation for inspiration but as a medium, music was always free to be more abstract and explore ideas related to structure, form, timing, and relationships between such things. Cheers, DJ

paulr
16-Oct-2006, 07:33
I think of Walter Pater's famous line,
"All art aspires to the condition of music."

And I think there's truth to it. Music is the one art form that is fundamentally abstract (it is pure form, and represents only itself), and at the same time universally powerful. All cultures have music. Usually it's at the core of their profoundest rites and rituals. We can explain its power rationally, but the explanations are rarely satisfying.

Whether or not this phenomenon is spiritual probably depends on your disposition toward whole idea of spirituality. But if music isn't a path to it, then it's hard to imagine what could be.

For me the best of the visual and verbal arts are the ones that come closest to music's deep well of power.

chris jordan
16-Oct-2006, 07:58
I think EW said it best: "Whenever I hear a Bach Fugue in my work, I know I have arrived."

Jim Galli
16-Oct-2006, 08:12
I have long been aware that some music is a shunt to my soul. It bypasses my brain and goes directly to my tear glands. Not often, but it can and does occasionally happen that way. Since I'm not a musician I've tasked myself with producing photos that will have that effect on some viewers. I didn't say I'm anywhere near reaching that goal, but never-the-less........that is my goal in picture making.

John Kasaian
16-Oct-2006, 08:25
Hmmmmm. Music certainly can be a path, but I'm thinking perhaps things like music, art, nature etc...are more indirect paths---kind of like airline "hubs" such as Denver, Chicago, Atlanta and Dallas---in other words it requires you to get "there" before you get to where you need to be. Maybe a more direct spiritual path would be driving through your neighborhood at night in pea soup fog, where you can barely make out the road you're driving on yet trusting it to take you home.

Hugo Zhang
16-Oct-2006, 09:39
This is Swann's impression of a piece of music...

"The year before, at an evening party, he had heard a piece of music played
on the piano and violin. At first he had appreciated only the material
quality of the sounds which those instruments secreted. And it had been a
source of keen pleasure when, below the narrow ribbon of the violin-part,
delicate, unyielding, substantial and governing the whole, he had suddenly
perceived, where it was trying to surge upwards in a flowing tide of
sound, the mass of the piano-part, multiform, coherent, level, and
breaking everywhere in melody like the deep blue tumult of the sea,
silvered and charmed into a minor key by the moonlight. But at a given
moment, without being able to distinguish any clear outline, or to give a
name to what was pleasing him, suddenly enraptured, he had tried to
collect, to treasure in his memory the phrase or harmony--he knew not
which--that had just been played, and had opened and expanded his soul,
just as the fragrance of certain roses, wafted upon the moist air of
evening, has the power of dilating our nostrils. Perhaps it was owing to
his own ignorance of music that he had been able to receive so confused an
impression, one of those that are, notwithstanding, our only purely
musical impressions, limited in their extent, entirely original, and
irreducible into any other kind. An impression of this order, vanishing in
an instant, is, so to speak, an impression _sine materia_. Presumably the
notes which we hear at such moments tend to spread out before our eyes,
over surfaces greater or smaller according to their pitch and volume; to
trace arabesque designs, to give us the sensation of breath or tenuity,
stability or caprice. But the notes themselves have vanished before these
sensations have developed sufficiently to escape submersion under those
which the following, or even simultaneous notes have already begun to
awaken in us. And this indefinite perception would continue to smother in
its molten liquidity the _motifs_ which now and then emerge, barely
discernible, to plunge again and disappear and drown; recognised only by
the particular kind of pleasure which they instil, impossible to describe,
to recollect, to name; ineffable;--if our memory, like a labourer who
toils at the laying down of firm foundations beneath the tumult of the
waves, did not, by fashioning for us facsimiles of those fugitive phrases,
enable us to compare and to contrast them with those that follow. And so,
hardly had the delicious sensation, which Swann had experienced, died
away, before his memory had furnished him with an immediate transcript,
summary, it is true, and provisional, but one on which he had kept his
eyes fixed while the playing continued, so effectively that, when the same
impression suddenly returned, it was no longer uncapturable. He was able
to picture to himself its extent, its symmetrical arrangement, its
notation, the strength of its expression; he had before him that definite
object which was no longer pure music, but rather design, architecture,
thought, and which allowed the actual music to be recalled. This time he
had distinguished, quite clearly, a phrase which emerged for a few moments
from the waves of sound. It had at once held out to him an invitation to
partake of intimate pleasures, of whose existence, before hearing it, he
had never dreamed, into which he felt that nothing but this phrase could
initiate him; and he had been filled with love for it, as with a new and
strange desire.

With a slow and rhythmical movement it led him here, there, everywhere,
towards a state of happiness noble, unintelligible, yet clearly indicated.
And then, suddenly having reached a certain point from which he was
prepared to follow it, after pausing for a moment, abruptly it changed its
direction, and in a fresh movement, more rapid, multiform, melancholy,
incessant, sweet, it bore him off with it towards a vista of joys
unknown. Then it vanished. He hoped, with a passionate longing, that he
might find it again, a third time. And reappear it did, though without
speaking to him more clearly, bringing him, indeed, a pleasure less
profound. But when he was once more at home he needed it, he was like a
man into whose life a woman, whom he has seen for a moment passing by, has
brought a new form of beauty, which strengthens and enlarges his own power
of perception, without his knowing even whether he is ever to see her
again whom he loves already, although he knows nothing of her, not even
her name.

Indeed this passion for a phrase of music seemed, in the first few months,
to be bringing into Swann's life the possibility of a sort of rejuvenation.
He had so long since ceased to direct his course towards any
ideal goal, and had confined himself to the pursuit of ephemeral
satisfactions, that he had come to believe, though without ever formally
stating his belief even to himself, that he would remain all his life in
that condition, which death alone could alter. More than this, since his
mind no longer entertained any lofty ideals, he had ceased to believe in
(although he could not have expressly denied) their reality. He had grown
also into the habit of taking refuge in trivial considerations, which
allowed him to set on one side matters of fundamental importance. Just as
he had never stopped to ask himself whether he would not have done better
by not going into society, knowing very well that if he had accepted an
invitation he must put in an appearance, and that afterwards, if he did
not actually call, he must at least leave cards upon his hostess; so in
his conversation he took care never to express with any warmth a personal
opinion about a thing, but instead would supply facts and details which
had a value of a sort in themselves, and excused him from shewing how much
he really knew. He would be extremely precise about the recipe for a dish,
the dates of a painter's birth and death, and the titles of his works.
Sometimes, in spite of himself, he would let himself go so far as to utter
a criticism of a work of art, or of some one's interpretation of life, but
then he would cloak his words in a tone of irony, as though he did not
altogether associate himself with what he was saying. But now, like a
confirmed invalid whom, all of a sudden, a change of air and surroundings,
or a new course of treatment, or, as sometimes happens, an organic change
in himself, spontaneous and unaccountable, seems to have so far recovered
from his malady that he begins to envisage the possibility, hitherto
beyond all hope, of starting to lead--and better late than never--a wholly
different life, Swann found in himself, in the memory of the phrase that
he had heard, in certain other sonatas which he had made people play over
to him, to see whether he might not, perhaps, discover his phrase among
them, the presence of one of those invisible realities in which he had
ceased to believe, but to which, as though the music had had upon the
moral barrenness from which he was suffering a sort of recreative
influence, he was conscious once again of a desire, almost, indeed, of the
power to consecrate his life. But, never having managed to find out whose
work it was that he had heard played that evening, he had been unable to
procure a copy, and finally had forgotten the quest. He had indeed, in the
course of the next few days, encountered several of the people who had
been at the party with him, and had questioned them; but most of them had
either arrived after or left before the piece was played; some had indeed
been in the house, but had gone into another room to talk, and those who
had stayed to listen had no clearer impression than the rest. As for his
hosts, they knew that it was a recently published work which the musicians
whom they had engaged for the evening had asked to be allowed to play;
but, as these last were now on tour somewhere, Swann could learn nothing
further. He had, of course, a number of musical friends, but, vividly as
he could recall the exquisite and inexpressible pleasure which the little
phrase had given him, and could see, still, before his eyes the forms that
it had traced in outline, he was quite incapable of humming over to them
the air. And so, at last, he ceased to think of it.

But to-night, at Mme. Verdurin's, scarcely had the little pianist begun to
play when, suddenly, after a high note held on through two whole bars,
Swann saw it approaching, stealing forth from underneath that resonance,
which was prolonged and stretched out over it, like a curtain of sound, to
veil the mystery of its birth--and recognised, secret, whispering,
articulate, the airy and fragrant phrase that he had loved. And it was so
peculiarly itself, it had so personal a charm, which nothing else could
have replaced, that Swann felt as though he had met, in a friend's
drawing-room, a woman whom he had seen and admired, once, in the street,
and had despaired of ever seeing her again. Finally the phrase withdrew
and vanished, pointing, directing, diligent among the wandering currents
of its fragrance, leaving upon Swann's features a reflection of its smile.
But now, at last, he could ask the name of his fair unknown (and was told
that it was the _andante_ movement of Vinteuil's sonata for the piano and
violin), he held it safe, could have it again to himself, at home, as
often as he would, could study its language and acquire its secret."

Christopher Perez
16-Oct-2006, 09:56
In India, some yogis use what's called a Lhya Tal. It's tuned to base resonance of the universe. When used correctly, a yogi can follow the sound to the point where the mind is dissolved. Completely.

But the use of this musical instrument is rare. Meditation is the more common route to what we in the West might call the "spirit world".

CXC
16-Oct-2006, 10:38
There is no spiritual world, and consequently no paths to it. Music can help you do the right-brain thing, though.

Dan Fromm
16-Oct-2006, 10:47
I agree with Chris.

Jim Jones
16-Oct-2006, 11:09
I'm even less a musician than photographer, but music at its best moves me more than photographs. Sometimes drama does, too. However, as I recall from much younger days, none of them moved me out of the everyday world as did sex.

Saulius
16-Oct-2006, 12:10
Does the medium of photography, likewise, provide a "path" to the spiritual world?
Different strokes for different folks. I think all the arts have potential to inspire and strongly move us. But to literally provide a path to a spiritual world, I think not. But then it depends on ones own personal beliefs.


The interview really stimulated my thinking. Is it true that music possesses unique power to the exclusion of other media?
I don't think so. As I said all the arts have the potential to inspire,but I do think some have an easier time at doing this then others. I think music is one which can succeed at this more often then photography. This is not to say it's easy to create such moving music, just that photography has a harder time at reaching the same level to move someone.

John Voss
16-Oct-2006, 14:10
Because music exists in real time and not in concrete space, its' temporal 'hold' lasts until it ends...on its terms not ours. If you are emotionally disposed to what is being expressed, you can be fully immersed more successfully than with a work of concrete 'art'. In this way, an emotional way, it seems to be more powerful for many than other art forms.

As attuned as I may be to any work of art, sculpture, or photography, none elicits the same sense of spirituality as consistantly and thoroughly as does music. I have no idea whether or not there is a spiritual dimension beyond the one I sense within myself, but that's where music brings me when it's music I love.

Ken Lee
16-Oct-2006, 14:37
All paths lead to the Spirit.

The only difference between any two paths, is how long it takes to get there, and what you see along the way.

When you get there, you realize that you have been there all along.

Donald Qualls
16-Oct-2006, 16:54
I listened to an NPR interview with a French pianist recently. She said she believed, "music is the most direct path to the spiritual world." This struck me as, more or less, an absolute statement. I am inclined to conclude that music simply "works" for this pianist.

Recent research suggests that psilocybin (aka magic mushrooms) may *actually* be the most direct path to spirituality (though I don't think I'd recommend that path, myself).

For photography, I see nothing spiritual about it -- it's art, surely, but I don't see that art and the "spiritual world" are necessarily connected in any way.

j.e.simmons
17-Oct-2006, 04:58
As attuned as I may be to any work of art, sculpture, or photography, none elicits the same sense of spirituality as consistantly and thoroughly as does music. I have no idea whether or not there is a spiritual dimension beyond the one I sense within myself, but that's where music brings me when it's music I love.

John, are you describing listening to music - performing it - or, perhaps, both?

I seem to find the same spirituality in making large format negatives as I do in performing music. I think it has something to do with the process. I don't find the same sense of spirituality in making the prints for some reason.

As for listening to music, or looking at photographs, I find it hard to not get left-brained about listening and looking, thinking of form and analysis, chord resolutions, orchestration - or samples in more modern music, paper, emulsion, composition, etc.
juan

Robert McClure
17-Oct-2006, 06:42
Chris, Dan,

No "spiritual world?"

Should you not request a definition of terms prior to making your assertion?

Robert

John Voss
17-Oct-2006, 07:30
John, are you describing listening to music - performing it - or, perhaps, both?



I should have said that I play cello professionally, and, of course, there is a great deal to think about when doing so that might derail spiritual immersion. But, when technique is as assimilated and 'automatic' as it needs to be by the time one performs something, there's a very successful synergy between the spirit and the physical. If it weren't so I wouldn't expect there to be very many engaging and inspiring performances. For me, there's very little emotional difference between listening and performing.

Al Seyle
17-Oct-2006, 09:33
"For me, there's very little emotional difference between listening and performing."

Right on, John. Music draws me as a listener intellectually and emotionally into it's own center of "spirituality". The music itself is the thing. It's not a representation of the thing as photography is. That's not to say great photography isn't inspirational, but it is still a representation of a something else.

jstraw
18-Oct-2006, 10:19
Music has demonstrated more facility for getting past my mind to my emotions than any other form of aesthetic stimulation.

Bruce Watson
18-Oct-2006, 10:34
There is no spiritual world, and consequently no paths to it. Music can help you do the right-brain thing, though.

Exactly.

Doug Dolde
18-Oct-2006, 12:30
Total BS.

Paul Coppin
20-Oct-2006, 18:30
Perhaps what needs to be defined is "music", not spirituality. My house is inhabited by a veritable cornucopia of musical instruments- keyboards, violin, woodwinds, guitars. But I can unequivocally state that music does not live here, no matter how hard I try. There is spirituality in the instrument however, and I enjoy them as much for being instruments, even as they appear to be devoid of music. Photography, I just realized, for me may be much the same :( At least I can say that I find spirituality in the tools of creativity, if not in the process... :)

TLGG1
28-Oct-2006, 21:33
And I prefer open spaces. Quiet. Undisturbed natural areas. Raging storms. Deserts. Mountains. Almost anything and place that does not involve other people. The natural music of nature beats anything I hear from a symphony orchestra.