shutterbug guy
17-Oct-2021, 16:43
I captured the negative with a Canon R5 using a CR99 rated lightbox with a film holder and a copy stand from Negative Supply.
The 120 Ektar 100 film was personally processed using Tetenal Colortec C-41. It was carefully timed and it was precisely temperature regulated. The photo was tweaked a tad in Luminar AI with a sky replacement. No serious color adjustments were made. The negative conversion was make using FilmLab and VueScan, this is the best I could produce. I'm not real happy with the colors.
220487
Well, I rescanned the negative using pretty much the same process except this time I used the Epson Perfection V850 Pro with SilverFast software. The final Tiff file was scanned at 3200 ppi, 6680x6680 scan dimensions, 127mb Tiff file.
Personally, I really like the colors much better than what I came up with within the previous effort.
Not that it matters but I just realized, I had scanned the negative upside down the first time :-).
220488
The 120 Ektar 100 film was personally processed using Tetenal Colortec C-41. It was carefully timed and it was precisely temperature regulated. The photo was tweaked a tad in Luminar AI with a sky replacement. No serious color adjustments were made. The negative conversion was make using FilmLab and VueScan, this is the best I could produce. I'm not real happy with the colors.
220487
Well, I rescanned the negative using pretty much the same process except this time I used the Epson Perfection V850 Pro with SilverFast software. The final Tiff file was scanned at 3200 ppi, 6680x6680 scan dimensions, 127mb Tiff file.
Personally, I really like the colors much better than what I came up with within the previous effort.
Not that it matters but I just realized, I had scanned the negative upside down the first time :-).
220488