PDA

View Full Version : 300mm lens on Linhof Master Technika



Atul Mohidekar
19-Jan-2020, 23:03
Hi,

I'm looking for hands-on experience of using a non-Tele 300mm lens (Nikkor M, APO Ronar, Fuji C) on a Linhof Master Technika V, 2000 or 3000. I was informed by Bob S (thanks Bob!) that MT 2000 and 3000 have the same maximum bellows draw. I'm assuming MT V also has the same max bellows draw.

1. Is a non-Tele 300mm lens usable on MT V, 2000 or 3000?

2. If the answer is "yes" for infinity focus (focal length = 300mm), what is the shortest distance at which this camera will allow to focus with a 300mm lens? What would be the flange distance between the ground glass and the center of the lens at this shortest focus distance (should be greater than 300mm)?

Thanks.

// Atul

Alan9940
20-Jan-2020, 07:12
Not sure about the models you list, but the MT (called Classic now) has max bellows extension of 15 3/4 inches. Therefore, infinity focus is certainly no problem and with nearly 4 inches more, I'm thinking you could obtain focus on just about any subject (outdoors) that you'd normally point this focal length at.

Atul Mohidekar
20-Jan-2020, 09:33
Thanks, Alan, for the info.

I would still like to hear from the users of 300mm lens on MT.

Richard Wasserman
20-Jan-2020, 10:26
I put my 300mm Docter Optics Apo-Germinar on my Technika MT2000 and extended the bellows to about 14.5 inches to the shutter. The camera was focused at about 7 feet. I could have extended the bellows a bit more, but I didn't want to over-stress them. Also using back movements you could gain about another inch or so of extension. Focusing a 300mm lens at infinity is simple and easy. I hope this helps

Willie
20-Jan-2020, 14:10
Shot with one a friend has. Master Technika and 300M Nikkor lens. He had made an extension lens board that added about 3 inches to the board from where it would normally be. He was using it for portraits a lot. When I tried it I did not do close work. Seemed like a good solution to not quite enough bellows draw when he wanted to use it closer for facial images.

Drew Wiley
20-Jan-2020, 15:08
Any of the 300's mentioned so far would be excellent.

Bob Salomon
20-Jan-2020, 15:49
If you use a modern 300 with a large diameter rear group you will probably need a special order Linhof 3 board with a z after the catalog number. When using some of the 240mm and longer lenses the rear barrel will prevent the board from mounting correctly and locking properly on the front standard so the hole relocates the lens to ensure proper mounting and locking.
These boards are always a special order from the factory.

Corran
20-Jan-2020, 15:53
Sounds like you are already looking at the proper field-type 300mm lenses, not the huge f/5.6 Plasmats. And as already reported, they work just fine on the MT. I have used the Nikkor-M 300mm on mine and I don't find it necessary to have a tophat board personally, but I don't usually use that for any kind of "close-up" work.

Atul Mohidekar
20-Jan-2020, 18:25
Thank you so much, Richard, for testing your 300mm lens on MT 2000.

Willie, Drew, Bob, Bryan, thank you for the the information.

Bryan, yes you are right, my question was about using a smaller field-type 300mm lens (f/8 type, not f/5.6 type) on MT.

From all these replies, it seems like a non-Tele, smaller field-type 300mm lens can be used on MT: with movement at infinity and with some limited movements at shorter focusing distances.

// Atul

Len Middleton
20-Jan-2020, 18:58
Atul,

My 355mm f9 Repro-Claron (approx. 14") will focus to about 10 feet on my Technika V with about 16" of bellows.

More severe case than you are suggesting, so I would say yes,

Len

Richard Wasserman
20-Jan-2020, 20:21
From all these replies, it seems like a non-Tele, smaller field-type 300mm lens can be used on MT: with movement at infinity and with some limited movements at shorter focusing distances.// Atul

If anything you will have a larger image circle the closer you focus, although at the bellows extensions we're talking about the difference will be negligible. Macro is another story...

A 300mm lens is eminently usable on a Technika and I think should have enough movements available to do just about anything you want.

Bob Salomon
20-Jan-2020, 20:32
If anything you will have a larger image circle the closer you focus, although at the bellows extensions we're talking about the difference will be negligible. Macro is another story...

A 300mm lens is eminently usable on a Technika and I think should have enough movements available to do just about anything you want.

Lenses as long as 360mm can becam coupled to 45 Technikas so 300mm is easily useable over a normal range of distances.

Drew Wiley
20-Jan-2020, 20:53
With either a 300M Nikkor or 300C Fuji you'll have an enormous amount of image circle wiggle room on 4x5 film, even at infinity. I have no personal experience with the Apo Ronar.

Atul Mohidekar
21-Jan-2020, 09:02
Thank you, Len, Richard, Bob and Drew, for the additional information.

Len Middleton
21-Jan-2020, 14:36
Lenses as long as 360mm can becam coupled to 45 Technikas so 300mm is easily useable over a normal range of distances.

Bob,

Just to be clear, as you talking ab out non-telephoto lenses, as my 355mm Repro Claron is not in the rear most focused position at infinity when the beds are extended.

I assumed that because of that my lens could not be cammed.

Looking forward to your clarification.

Thanks,

Len

Bob Salomon
21-Jan-2020, 15:06
Bob,

Just to be clear, as you talking ab out non-telephoto lenses, as my 355mm Repro Claron is not in the rear most focused position at infinity when the beds are extended.

I assumed that because of that my lens could not be cammed.

Looking forward to your clarification.

Thanks,

Len

If the shop was willing to they should be able to use a 360 cam to cam your lens.