PDA

View Full Version : Quick Question Tray Processing



Two23
4-Jun-2019, 16:00
I have several sheets of 5x7 FP4 I want to process and have been waiting on the SP810 I ordered. I know I can tray process these and do have all the stuff. I've had no trouble processing 5x7 plates. B&W film must be done in the dark, not safe light. Does the entire process have to be done in the dark? I thought I read that only the developing does. I'm not sure how I could easily shift sheets around in the dark, so here's my plan: (in dark) take sheet from holder and drop into develop tray. Process normally (have Gralab 300 glow in dark timer.) Take sheet out and drop it into stop bath, 30 seconds. Now, turn on low watt red safe light & place sheet into fixer. Fix normally (5 minutes) in fix tray. Remove from fix and place in wash tray. Will this work? Can I get away with b&w film using low power red light AFTER develop & stop bath? This would make things a helluva a lot easier for me.


Kent in SD

David Schaller
4-Jun-2019, 16:16
I wait a few minutes with the film in the fixer to be sure. Why take a chance? After that I turn on the lights.

Maris Rusis
4-Jun-2019, 17:22
Yes! A developed film in a full strength acid stop bath for 30 seconds will not be harmed by exposure to moderate light. Any trace of carried over developer is completely inactivated in an acid environment. The "printing out" effect if any is so small that I have never been able to see it or measure it. I occasionally demonstrate sheet film development to students and enthusiasts and after explaining how expensive the film is and the price of mistakes I do a dev+stop sequence and turn the room lights on before the fix. They get a fright but I don't because I know there is no harm.
A fully developed but not fixed negative looks quite different from a fixed one. It's a look worth becoming familiar with if development by inspection is going to be attempted.

Two23
4-Jun-2019, 17:51
I've been using a few ounces of white vinegar in distilled water for stop. How much vinegar makes it "full strength?"


Kent in SD

Larry Gebhardt
4-Jun-2019, 18:31
Vinegar is around 5% acetic acid and stop bathe should be 1 to 2%, so use about 1 ounce vinegar plus 3 ounces water, scaled to the volume you need.

Two23
4-Jun-2019, 19:04
Vinegar is around 5% acetic acid and stop bathe should be 1 to 2%, so use about 1 ounce vinegar plus 3 ounces water, scaled to the volume you need.


Thanks!


Kent in SD

Peter Lewin
4-Jun-2019, 19:15
Are you going to develop the sheets one at a time? If not, you start by dropping them all into a tray with only water so that they don't stick together in the developer. Then transfer them one by one into developer, shuffle process, and move them one by one into stop bath and shuffle. Then you can move them into the fixer together, and shuffle them in the fixer. While I trust Maris's answer, I have never turned the light on until after the negatives are fixed. If you can handle them in the developer and move to stop bath in the dark, I would think the final move to the fixer in the dark wouldn't be a problem.

Peter Collins
4-Jun-2019, 19:27
I unload the film from the holder and put directly each sheet individually into a tray with RO water at approx the same temp as the developer in the next tray to the right. I completely immerse each sheet. By doing so, the films don't stick to each other when I pick them up and put them in the developer, all at once, and then start the timer and agitate. (There are so many ways to agitate, and some workers really get agitated about it.) Interestingly, when I turn on the lights after development, the RO water tray is an inky purple-blue.

I handle the films much the way Fred Picker wrote. My max number of films is 6 per session--more, and I screw up the agitation because the films are slippery and require some "shepherding" in the developer to keep them aligned with notch code in the upper right, the same way they went into and came out of the holder. Stop time is very approx. 10s will do just as well as 30s. Just long enough to rotate all the films once. Then to the fixer. I wash approx per Ilford instructions for rapid wash. 5 agitations in RO H2) and dump, then 10 agitations and dump, then finally 20 agitations and dump.

My stuff isn't so good or so important that some museum is going to have fits caring for my negatives.

This works for me.

Two23
4-Jun-2019, 19:49
I was going to begin by just doing one sheet at a time. I've pretty well got it down processing the 5x7 plates under safe light, and am pretty sure I can do one sheet at a time now too.


Kent in SD

Jim Noel
4-Jun-2019, 23:46
I unload the film from the holder and put directly each sheet individually into a tray with RO water at approx the same temp as the developer in the next tray to the right. I completely immerse each sheet. By doing so, the films don't stick to each other when I pick them up and put them in the developer, all at once, and then start the timer and agitate. (There are so many ways to agitate, and some workers really get agitated about it.) Interestingly, when I turn on the lights after development, the RO water tray is an inky purple-blue.

I handle the films much the way Fred Picker wrote. My max number of films is 6 per session--more, and I screw up the agitation because the films are slippery and require some "shepherding" in the developer to keep them aligned with notch code in the upper right, the same way they went into and came out of the holder. Stop time is very approx. 10s will do just as well as 30s. Just long enough to rotate all the films once. Then to the fixer. I wash approx per Ilford instructions for rapid wash. 5 agitations in RO H2) and dump, then 10 agitations and dump, then finally 20 agitations and dump.

My stuff isn't so good or so important that some museum is going to have fits caring for my negatives.

This works for me.

I never use approximately the same temperatures. I stay within one degree for all solutions.

Leigh
5-Jun-2019, 00:04
Interestingly, when I turn on the lights after development, the RO water tray is an inky purple-blue.
Nothing unusual about that. It's the water-soluble anti-halation dye from the back of the film.

If you use a pre-wash, the dye ends up in it.
If not, it ends up in the developer.

- Leigh

Doremus Scudder
5-Jun-2019, 11:05
One caveat!

Yes, you can turn on the lights as soon as the development has been stopped by an acid stop bath IF:

1. Your developer is an alkaline one (i.e., not Amidol, etc.) and is truly stopped by the stop bath and...
2. If your fixer is also acid.

This latter is important. If you use an alkaline fixer, carried-over developer will be reactivated in the alkaline environment and start to work again, this time on the newly-exposed parts of your negatives that just got exposed by your turning on the lights. Developer is not washed out in the stop bath, just rendered inactive. In an alkaline environment it gets reactivated and will start developing again. If you have non-image exposure, fogging will occur (don't ask me how I know this).

Alkaline developer plus acid stop and acid fix and you'll be fine turning on a light right after the stop.

FWIW, it's sometimes fun to turn on the light after the film has been in the stop 30 seconds or so and examine the image with the uncleared image, then transfer to the fix and watch the image clear.

A side note on tray processing: It's not hard; it has been my main method for well over 30 years now. Get a couple of scrap sheets and practice shuffling, first in the light, and then with your eyes closed and then in the dark. You'll find you gain dexterity quickly. Do this before you develop real film.

Best,

Doremus

Pere Casals
5-Jun-2019, 11:30
Can I get away with b&w film using low power red light AFTER develop & stop bath? This would make things a helluva a lot easier for me.

After stop bath you can open lights at full power, no problem. I do it always. Just ensure stop bath time is enough, I open lights after 20 seconds with acid stop bath or 40s with plain water stop bath.





B&W film must be done in the dark, not safe light. Does the entire process have to be done in the dark?

I do that:

> I place the tray inside a paper safe so I can develop lights open, you may use any kind of light tight box. Or you may do that in darkness...

> Then I close lights to move the sheet to a plain water stop bath, after some 40s I open lights, development is stopped so light is not harmful anymore, then I move the sheet to the fixer tray.

> As I'm fixing lights open then I know the fixer strength from the time it takes to clear the negative, this is removing the not developed silver halide that's yellowish. Fixing time should be 2x the time it takes to clear.

> When a sheet is in the fixer tray I can start developing the next one inside the paper safe or light tight box.

Two23
5-Jun-2019, 12:29
For developer i use hc110. Fixer is photographers formulay 4.


Kent in SD

Bill Burk
5-Jun-2019, 21:57
TF-4 is an alkaline fixer, so the advice may be to leave the lights off for a while.

I don't know first hand, but think you might be better keeping the lights out.

Pere Casals
6-Jun-2019, 01:19
TF-4 is an alkaline fixer, so the advice may be to leave the lights off for a while.

I don't know first hand, but think you might be better keeping the lights out.

Bill, I've tested it well and I found that fixing lights open is safe. Checking it is as easy as processing two not exposed film ends, one fixed lights open and the other one in the dark, you won't find a difference in the fog, testing with a densitometer.

Even in the case we open lights just when we move film from developer to stop there is a very little risk that we add fog, because the newly exposed crystals won't start their development until some 1min has passed, because development starts after an induction time, and by then the stop bath has stopped well any development.

This negative was tray processed and "lights open" fixed (common alkaline rapid fixer) , base+fog is 0.10D: https://www.flickr.com/photos/125592977@N05/28693688313/

Anyway I reiterate, if one finds that fixing film lights open is convenient then he can check that there is no damage, just processing 2 film ends and comparing.

Paper is different... fixing lights open is very risky because it should be ensured that no developer remains inside, wich is specially difficult with FB paper.

interneg
6-Jun-2019, 03:29
There's no reason to use anything other than an acid stop - otherwise you're risking all sorts of problems - especially with a water rinse instead of a stop. In particular you are relying on the inductance time of the processed film being long enough relative to the ambient light in the room you are working in to not cause fog. It's lazy & bad practice. Doremus' procedure is how it's supposed to be done if you want to get the lights on early.

With Ilford & some other FB papers (current Adox etc, however, not Foma & especially not Fomabrom) you can get the lights on 15-20s into the fix, if you are using film strength fix. This is possible because of the structure of the emulsion (very specific controlled grain structures, high chloride, low iodide) & the speed with which it fixes - given that they are designed to fix & clear in 30s, this should not be surprising. The higher iodide (slower fixing) Fomabrom paper doesn't work this way.

Pere Casals
6-Jun-2019, 04:04
There's no reason to use anything other than an acid stop - otherwise you're risking all sorts of problems - especially with a water rinse instead of a stop. In particular you are relying on the inductance time of the processed film being long enough relative to the ambient light in the room you are working in to not cause fog.

With film, 20s in acid stop or 40s in plain water stop are well safe to open lights, development has been totally stopped so induction time plays no role.

Induction time only plays a role if you open lights before development is stopped. I was recommending stopping before openning lights, and considering induction time as an additional safety belt that ensures that no harm is there.

I agree that photopapers are more difficult, and better if fixing well before openning lights. While I've never had a problem with film I've destroyed prints by openning lights.

Two23
6-Jun-2019, 05:31
I gave it a shot last night. Set up my trays in my bath tub and had everything ready. Had my Gralab 300 timer sitting in easy reach on my toilet and film holder in my hand. I turned off the lights, plopped a sheet of 4x5 FP4+ into the HC110, and reached over to start the time. Oops, not plugged in! Used the tiny light on my watch to find the wall outlet and plugged the timer in. Oops--forgot to unplug the red safe light from it. The room lit up red! Quickly unplugged it and decided to continue processing to see what I got. Finished the develop time and dropped the sheet into the 1:3 vinegar stop bath. Gave it a minute, used the dim light of my cell phone to see if anything on the neg. There was! Poured the PF4 into the fixer tray, turned off the phone light, and dropped the sheet into the fixer. Continued until I had washed the sheet for a minute and then turned on the light. There was an image, but there was also a shadow of the edge of the tray across the negative. Obviously the red light screwed it up. Undaunted, I tried a second sheet, this time in the dark. (Had to move the glow in the dark timer further away from the trays.) Success! The neg came out perfectly! Unfortunately the lens was not well focused. At least I now know I can do it. I'm waiting on receiving the Stearman SP810 I ordered to do 5x7 (and 8x10 some day) but until then I can process 5x7 sheets if I need to .

Thanks to all for help.


Kent in SD

Leigh
6-Jun-2019, 06:08
Success! The neg came out perfectly! Unfortunately the lens was not well focused. At least I now know I can do it.
Very good, Kent.

Congratulations.

- Leigh

goamules
6-Jun-2019, 07:49
I am a seat of the pants guy. I don't use a stop bath, just a water bath to dilute any developer on the sheet. After a 10 second rinse in water, I go to fix, all in pitch dark. After 30 seconds in Fix, I turn on the red light. It's how I was taught, and works.