PDA

View Full Version : Weird Heliar 42 cm



lungovw
9-Apr-2019, 05:51
189882

Hello, a friend of mine gave me this Heliar 42cm. The barrel is un lousy condition but iris and glass are quite OK so I would like to put it back to work. I found strange that the way the flange is positioned, the branded part goes inside camera body. But it leaves the aperture ring and a lens hood properly on the outside. Not sure if this lens hood is original because I have an Heliar 24 cm and it hasn't any. I would love to see a picture of a well maintained Heliar 42cm in barrel for comparison. Could anybody post one here? or any comments on this assembly?

Jim Noel
9-Apr-2019, 16:27
All I have to say is I wish I would be so lucky. What a gift!

Steven Tribe
9-Apr-2019, 23:45
This is very different from the usual Heliar.

Engraved as F4 (Normal is 4.5 or 3.5!).
Iris between front and middle lens(Normal middle and rear lens!).
Early heliars do have lens hoods.

It has the usual brittle aluminium alloy in this sunken mount version - which explains why the iris has been moved.
Obviously a special version made to suit special product. Military? Or is it possible it is somehow assembled incorrectly - I didn't think it was possible!

Serial number would be useful?

Jim Galli
10-Apr-2019, 07:50
You've got all the necessary pieces. All it needs is to be re-assembled in the proper order. But it's obviously VERY fragile. I wish you the best of luck. Think about getting some of the copper "tape" that the stained glass window crowd use and wrapping that broken piece with several layers before you unscrew things. This stuff (https://www.ebay.com/itm/Copper-Foil-Adhesive-Tape-for-Soldering-Paper-Circuits-Stained-Glass-Work/113676620806?hash=item1a77a79406:g:l1EAAOSww35cgGgC).

Amedeus
10-Apr-2019, 23:00
Assembled incorrectly as far as I can tell and yes, that is possible on some lenses where the Iris cell unscrews from the barrel.

As Jim said, needs to done carefully. The early aluminum is extremely brittle but yes, what a nice gift !

Cheers,

Pere Casals
11-Apr-2019, 00:02
Could anybody post one here?

You may see many at Ebay

189965

https://www.ebay.es/sch/i.html?_odkw=cambo+8x10&LH_PrefLoc=2&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trksid=m570.l1313&_nkw=Heliar+42cm&_sacat=0

Steven Tribe
11-Apr-2019, 04:08
The one you have is special as the engraving is on the side of the barrel and says clearly F4!
I have tried with an early 36cm to get the same misassembly as yours. It can't be done, it requires the iris being attached to the barrel and flange with threads. Perhaps this was standard practice with the 42, 48 and 60cm versions in the first few years of production?

Pere Casals
11-Apr-2019, 05:08
The one you have is special as the engraving is on the side of the barrel and says clearly F4!


It is a 4,5...

the "," is still visible but the "5" has mostly disappeared. In german decimals are separated with a ","

Pfsor
11-Apr-2019, 06:40
Well spotted, Pere! (in fact the 5 is still hardly visible). Kudos to your eyes!

Pere Casals
11-Apr-2019, 06:49
Well spotted, Pere! (in fact the 5 is still hardly visible). Kudos to your eyes!

I've seen too many heliars (that I can't buy) at ebay :) Also I think I don't deserve owning one...

Dan Fromm
11-Apr-2019, 07:16
Papi, if you can live with f/9 maximum aperture, get an Apo-Saphir.

lungovw
11-Apr-2019, 07:25
Thanks everybody for the useful information. And yes, the ,5 is almost gone but it is there. It is a f/4,5. The serial number is 108353, not so sure about the 8 as it is almost gone too. Maybe it was fitted to an equipment with special needs in terms of geometry as Steven suggested. I am saying that because although apparently assembled in a wrong way, if I put it the way the flange is normally placed, outside camera body, I get a nice image from a building in front of my window at more or less 42 cm from iris. I think that if somebody would have assembled it in a wrong way probably the optical elements would no work properly. I have to study it carefully and decide what to do about it. The glass seems to be simply dusty and dirty, but there is no separation or prominent scratches over the elements.

Louis Pacilla
11-Apr-2019, 07:37
If this is the correct orientaion then your shooting it backwards or your iris is in the wrong position UNLESS your iris system is a complex iris where the ring for setting the stop is pushed forward while the iris is nearer the rear of the lens.

I know because I own a TRUE factory correct countersunk 1911 48cm Heliar and it DOES have the compex iris with the blade in the correct Heliar position where the iris ring is in front as is the Voigtlander script and all other information is on the front rim of the front cell. It should look EXACTLY like all other countersunk Heliars only scaled way up to the 48cm size. If I find time today/tomorrow I'll post photos of my beautiful countersunk 48CM f4.5 Heliar. BTW it has the same screw in tabs/post on the iris ring of my counter sunk 48cm Heliar as the Universal Heliar uses on the SF rind.

lungovw
11-Apr-2019, 10:25
189972189971189973189974

Doing a quick & dirty test: when lens hood is facing the scene, image is OK, but in fact iris is not in the right place for a Heliar, it is close to the front element. But it focus about 42 cm as expected. If I reverse the lens and let the iris on the back, the lens hood facing the image, and flange in wrong position, the image is clearly worse and focus is about 35 cm.

Looking now to the front and back pictures, it is strange to me that there is no branding/info on none of them. On the opposite side, the one having a lens hood, the mounting doesn't look at all like a front element.

Nodda Duma
11-Apr-2019, 11:10
The focus will still work out to be sort of 42cm because focal length in that design is more dependant on the elements themselves rather than relative position, but aberration correction would be wonky.

Reversing it and getting something different makes sense since focal length is measured from the exit pupil position (by convention for object at infinity) and not the physical back of the lens.

Louis Pacilla
11-Apr-2019, 11:32
Hey lungovw
I'll really try to get photos made of my 48cm Heliar in factory countersunk mount and I'll try to figure out how to post them later today/tomorrow so you will get the idea of a true & proper factory countersunk set up is. It is very much just a scaled up version of a Voigtlander smaller sized countersunk mount. All lens information is on front rim with a nicely made rear portion of the outer barrel that protects the linkages for the iris the iris ring has a pair of tabs for making changing f stop easier and they are the same as those used on the Universal Heliar SF ring. The center element is attached to the front group like on normal Heliar but there is an inner barrel of sorts that holds the rear group & iris setup as well as the front/center groups screw into this barrel too.
The lens actually looks like a GIANT eye on my 8a.I made a unique set up so the that I could mount it on a 10x10 board w/ a 9x9 box built ooff the back of the 10x10 board and on the back of the box I have a large #8 Packard mounted w/ the two tubes coming out of the front 10x10 lens board. So all the countersunk part w/ front cell iris control + 2 tubes bellow and the Packard & rear portion of lens barrel are inside the camera w/ only the part meant to be exposed exposed.

Pere Casals
14-Apr-2019, 09:16
Papi, if you can live with f/9 maximum aperture, get an Apo-Saphir.

Dan, thanks for the suggestion, I've just learned that's a heliar design. It looks it has a harder bokeh than voigts, but it's an impressive glass !