tim atherton
6-Oct-2005, 17:29
there have been a few questions on here recently about copyright
Two decision on copyright law were recently handed down:
Court Upholds Judgment Against National Geographic
"A federal court judge in Miami has upheld a $400,000 jury award for photographer Jerry Greenberg in his long-running copyright infringement claims against the National Geographic Society, Greenberg and his attorney Norman Davis reported to PDN.
Greenberg won the jury award in 2003, but NGS sought to have it vacated or reduced on the grounds that it was excessive.
“We filed our lawsuit against National Geographic in 1997. Eight years later I’m pleased to report that copyright law is alive and well in the US District Court in Miami,” Greenberg says. .."
More at:
http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/newswire/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001260330
and
Court Says Lookalike Photo Doesn't Infringe
"A New York federal court judge has rejected photographer Bill Diodato's lawsuit alleging that the Kate Spade fashion accessories company illegally copied one of Diodato's images for use in an ad campaign.
The court's decision was based on the principle that copyright protects only the expression of an idea, not the idea itself. The two photos in dispute were based on the same concept-a stylish woman's legs, as they appear from beneath a bathroom stall-but the photos expressed that concept differently, the court concluded..."
more at:
http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/newswire/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001262144
take them FWIW....
Two decision on copyright law were recently handed down:
Court Upholds Judgment Against National Geographic
"A federal court judge in Miami has upheld a $400,000 jury award for photographer Jerry Greenberg in his long-running copyright infringement claims against the National Geographic Society, Greenberg and his attorney Norman Davis reported to PDN.
Greenberg won the jury award in 2003, but NGS sought to have it vacated or reduced on the grounds that it was excessive.
“We filed our lawsuit against National Geographic in 1997. Eight years later I’m pleased to report that copyright law is alive and well in the US District Court in Miami,” Greenberg says. .."
More at:
http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/newswire/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001260330
and
Court Says Lookalike Photo Doesn't Infringe
"A New York federal court judge has rejected photographer Bill Diodato's lawsuit alleging that the Kate Spade fashion accessories company illegally copied one of Diodato's images for use in an ad campaign.
The court's decision was based on the principle that copyright protects only the expression of an idea, not the idea itself. The two photos in dispute were based on the same concept-a stylish woman's legs, as they appear from beneath a bathroom stall-but the photos expressed that concept differently, the court concluded..."
more at:
http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/newswire/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001262144
take them FWIW....