Greg
2-Jul-2017, 16:31
Shooting with an 11x14 in the wind has sometimes presented me with a way less then solid, stable image on the GG.
My first 11x14 (in the 1979s) was a wooden flat bed Burke & James view camera and my next camera (in the 1980s) was an 11x14 Improved Empire State View camera. Shot many a negative with movement on a windy day. Almost always discovering this after processing the negatives.
Several years ago finally purchased an 11x14 Chamonix view camera. Absolutely a really great camera, but still a stiff wind caused it to be less than 100% stable.
Considered purchasing a Wind Stabilizer Kit (http://www.filmholders.com/wskit.html) but the front standard of the Chamonix seemed to me to be already stable enough. I postulated that problem was more with the wind hitting the extended bellows and torquing the camera's bed.
So adapted my Manfrotto Single extension arm (made for stabilizing a DX camera body on the back of a tripod mounted 800mm lens in my case). Bottom of the arm was clamped onto one of the tripod's legs and on the other end I adapted a clamp to secure it to the center front of the camera bed. Was only OK. Then bought another Manfrotto Single extension arm and used two to stabilize the camera. Both attached at one end to one of the tripod's legs and the other ends clamped to each corner of the front bed. Triangular configuration of them really made a difference... with this configuration made an exposure in a gusty wind with minimal (acceptable) or no apparent movement of the camera.
Carrying both extension arms equated the weight of carrying 2 additional lenses but with a lot more bulk. The Manfrotto extension arms had to go.
When I was moving into my current place, the movers left behind several very large "moving" elastic bands: 3/4" wide, very thick, and 28" long. Finally it dawned on me... wrap one end of the large elastic band around the front of the camera's bed just in front of the front standard and using a small clamp, secure it with tension to one of the tripod's legs. Found out that the tension needed to stabilize the camera's front bed was minimal and by no means enough to stress the camera's bed in any way. This also gave me the triangular configuration but at so much less weight and bulk of the 2 extension arms.
This has worked out to be just a great solution for me. Very simple, basic, and very light weight to carry.
Comments appreciated...
My first 11x14 (in the 1979s) was a wooden flat bed Burke & James view camera and my next camera (in the 1980s) was an 11x14 Improved Empire State View camera. Shot many a negative with movement on a windy day. Almost always discovering this after processing the negatives.
Several years ago finally purchased an 11x14 Chamonix view camera. Absolutely a really great camera, but still a stiff wind caused it to be less than 100% stable.
Considered purchasing a Wind Stabilizer Kit (http://www.filmholders.com/wskit.html) but the front standard of the Chamonix seemed to me to be already stable enough. I postulated that problem was more with the wind hitting the extended bellows and torquing the camera's bed.
So adapted my Manfrotto Single extension arm (made for stabilizing a DX camera body on the back of a tripod mounted 800mm lens in my case). Bottom of the arm was clamped onto one of the tripod's legs and on the other end I adapted a clamp to secure it to the center front of the camera bed. Was only OK. Then bought another Manfrotto Single extension arm and used two to stabilize the camera. Both attached at one end to one of the tripod's legs and the other ends clamped to each corner of the front bed. Triangular configuration of them really made a difference... with this configuration made an exposure in a gusty wind with minimal (acceptable) or no apparent movement of the camera.
Carrying both extension arms equated the weight of carrying 2 additional lenses but with a lot more bulk. The Manfrotto extension arms had to go.
When I was moving into my current place, the movers left behind several very large "moving" elastic bands: 3/4" wide, very thick, and 28" long. Finally it dawned on me... wrap one end of the large elastic band around the front of the camera's bed just in front of the front standard and using a small clamp, secure it with tension to one of the tripod's legs. Found out that the tension needed to stabilize the camera's front bed was minimal and by no means enough to stress the camera's bed in any way. This also gave me the triangular configuration but at so much less weight and bulk of the 2 extension arms.
This has worked out to be just a great solution for me. Very simple, basic, and very light weight to carry.
Comments appreciated...