PDA

View Full Version : Does anyone recognize this lens?



scheinfluger_77
8-Dec-2015, 17:11
I came across this lens; http://www.ebay.com/itm/201474948632?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT while trolling ebay. I can't find any info at Camera Eccentric. I don't think I've ever seena an apo Wollensak, any ideas about this one?

mdarnton
8-Dec-2015, 17:20
I've got a 10-inch f10 apo-Raptar in a shutter. It's fine.

Duolab123
8-Dec-2015, 20:30
Dollars to Donuts it's a lens from a small process camera. Looks like a Damn nice lens. Wollensak was a great company, helped win WWII��

Duolab123
8-Dec-2015, 20:31
I've got a 10-inch f10 apo-Raptar in a shutter. It's fine.

What size is the shutter?

Duolab123
8-Dec-2015, 20:33
Works out to be about 2 70mm would make a helluva nice 8 x10 macro or enlarging lens

LabRat
8-Dec-2015, 22:59
I shoot the aluminium bodied version of this lens on my 4X5 Super D RB Graflex, and it is an excellent lens...

Very sharp, bright (for it's speed), contrasty, and saturated color... Image just pops into focus with it... A keeper!!!!

Steve K

scheinfluger_77
9-Dec-2015, 09:34
What size is the shutter?

No shutter on this one.

Just wondering if it will cover 5x7 with movements at infinity. The closest thing I've found in Camera Eccentric is the 10.75 red dot Artar. The brochure says it covers 5.5 x 7.5 at 1:10.

scheinfluger_77
9-Dec-2015, 09:40
Oh poo! I couldn't help myself, I bought it.

desertrat
9-Dec-2015, 11:14
No shutter on this one.

Just wondering if it will cover 5x7 with movements at infinity. The closest thing I've found in Camera Eccentric is the 10.75 red dot Artar. The brochure says it covers 5.5 x 7.5 at 1:10.
The Apochromatic Raptar is a different design than the Artar. It's a double gauss lens, where the Artar is a dialyte. I have an Apochromatic Raptar in the same focal length, but mine is f10 instead of 9.5. It covers 8X10 at f45.

mdarnton
9-Dec-2015, 13:14
Mine's in a #3 Universal, but it's not a direct fit; there are aluminum adapter rings on both sides.

scheinfluger_77
12-Dec-2015, 11:07
Thanks for the info everyone.

Oren Grad
13-Dec-2015, 09:30
This thread was launched with a link to an active eBay listing, which is against Forum policy, and with no description of the item whatsoever.

Second, the discussion that follows depends entirely on reference to the item and is uninformative to anyone who hasn't seen the listing.

Which means third, that as soon as the eBay listing scrolls off, this thread will be entirely useless and will unnecessarily clutter the Forum and waste the time of others searching for information.

If you'd like to ask for advice about an item listed elsewhere, instead of linking please take the trouble to describe the item as best you can and ask your question on the basis of your description. In this case that would have been very easy to do. Or to put it differently: please be considerate of other members and try to frame your questions in a way that will also be useful to others in the future.

Thanks!