Kirks518
26-Jun-2015, 08:24
Currently, I have monkeyed around with some stuff I have, and can get my Calumet 4x5 onto an old Velbon Sherpa that I have. The depth of the female receptor on the camera is too deep for the QR plate from the Sherpa, so I had to use the Gitzo adapter base from my Peak Design belt clip, then attach the QR plate to that. Not an ideal setup, and the tripod is just barely stable enough, but I'm not truly comfortable with the setup. I had no plans of getting a 4x5, and had no tripod that would truly work for such a beast.
So I have a chance to grab a tried and true vintage Tiltall, which by all accounts is a good tripod for a 4x5 system. Cost is $40 (seems good to me).
I notice that the Tiltall head is a flat round circle, rather than a rectangular dovetailed piece like what the camera has for the connection. Does that mean I'm back to using/getting a Gitzo QR plate? Just seems that having two plates wouldn't be as stable as it could/should be. Or, is the mounting screw on the Tiltall long enough to reach the recessed female on the camera?
*** Oh, and I do have a Manfrotto 625 Hexagonal QR adapter, but I don't think it will fit the camera either.
So I have a chance to grab a tried and true vintage Tiltall, which by all accounts is a good tripod for a 4x5 system. Cost is $40 (seems good to me).
I notice that the Tiltall head is a flat round circle, rather than a rectangular dovetailed piece like what the camera has for the connection. Does that mean I'm back to using/getting a Gitzo QR plate? Just seems that having two plates wouldn't be as stable as it could/should be. Or, is the mounting screw on the Tiltall long enough to reach the recessed female on the camera?
*** Oh, and I do have a Manfrotto 625 Hexagonal QR adapter, but I don't think it will fit the camera either.