DrTang
16-Apr-2015, 13:36
say you had a 8x10 "negative" and you achieved a proper scan with it
you took down all the settings from the histogram and such
so now.. if you want to make consistant contact proofs from other negatives.. you first put in that Negative.. then adjust the settings to your standard setting.. then remove that negative and replace it with the one you want to proof
that way you could tell from that scan how under or over or over developed your negative was and could modify your process
now imagine if that original standard negative was a 8x10 sheet of acetate with designs printed on it so as to render a good test exposure when used in the above way
-- just trying to figure out a way to use a scanner to proof negs like one did with an enlarger and proof frame
did that all make sense?
you took down all the settings from the histogram and such
so now.. if you want to make consistant contact proofs from other negatives.. you first put in that Negative.. then adjust the settings to your standard setting.. then remove that negative and replace it with the one you want to proof
that way you could tell from that scan how under or over or over developed your negative was and could modify your process
now imagine if that original standard negative was a 8x10 sheet of acetate with designs printed on it so as to render a good test exposure when used in the above way
-- just trying to figure out a way to use a scanner to proof negs like one did with an enlarger and proof frame
did that all make sense?