Primo I.
6-Oct-2013, 10:12
Hi everyone,
I wanted to reach out to everyone out there to see if you can identify and provide any reference to this recently acquired lens. I have tried for a number of days to research and find out more about it, but to no avail. The Kodak lens handbook was limited on any information regarding this Anastigmat other than the KODAK ANASTIGMAT LENSES FOR PROFESSIONAL CAMERAS which were numbered No.21 to No. 36 covered in the 1939 Kodak Lens and Shutter table.
As you can see in the photos, although it states, "kodak anastigmat f 4.5 7 1/2 inch 5x7" there is no other number to designate. Could it just be an earlier Kodak Anastigmat No. 33 which is also a f/4.5 7 1/2 inch lens? This lens jsut states the following in case the photo is not clear enough to see, " Kodak Anastigmat F-4.5 7 1/2 in. 5x7 with a serial of NO. 33113.
Any input would be appreciated. The only thing I can come with is it could be No. 113 produced in the year 1933 based on the serial number information I found, but I am not really sure.
Regards,
Primo103088103089103090
I wanted to reach out to everyone out there to see if you can identify and provide any reference to this recently acquired lens. I have tried for a number of days to research and find out more about it, but to no avail. The Kodak lens handbook was limited on any information regarding this Anastigmat other than the KODAK ANASTIGMAT LENSES FOR PROFESSIONAL CAMERAS which were numbered No.21 to No. 36 covered in the 1939 Kodak Lens and Shutter table.
As you can see in the photos, although it states, "kodak anastigmat f 4.5 7 1/2 inch 5x7" there is no other number to designate. Could it just be an earlier Kodak Anastigmat No. 33 which is also a f/4.5 7 1/2 inch lens? This lens jsut states the following in case the photo is not clear enough to see, " Kodak Anastigmat F-4.5 7 1/2 in. 5x7 with a serial of NO. 33113.
Any input would be appreciated. The only thing I can come with is it could be No. 113 produced in the year 1933 based on the serial number information I found, but I am not really sure.
Regards,
Primo103088103089103090