![]() |
|
Welcome! You are currently viewing our board as a guest which allows you to view most discussions and gain limited access to other features. By joining you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access other features. Registration is fast and simple so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Unified View | LF Home Page | Guidelines | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing Traditional film, film processing, lab processing, chemistry, paper, traditional printing processes and conservation. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Oct 1997
Posts: 1,227
|
Tungsten or daylight for this job?
In checking the lighting of a large building I need to shoot I get a reading of 4900 Kelvin. It is a fluorescent reading. I plan on shooting it with daylight ra ther than tungsten film and using 25 units of magenta color correction. It will be shot on 8x10 and the final outcome is prints only, 26x40 inches or maybe up t o 60 inches long. (approximately) A long, narrow building with a big sign out fr ont lit from the inside, same color temp as the building. The format works well for the longer, narrow print. I am shooting with a 120 Nikkor on the 8x10 & crop ping top & bottom a bit to get the image right. The question here is whether to go with chrome or C41. The final image is prints for corporate wallspace. There is the outside possibility of magazine use in the future. So, I get two question s here. Print or chrome film? And, since I am shooting about 5am or so when the early morning sky will be 1.4 stops darker than the dark areas of a well lit bui lding, do I shoot tungsten or daylight film? Tungsten does marvelous things to t he sky color but daylight will be saturated as well, though not the deep purple of the tungsten. Any recommendations here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,025
|
Tungsten or daylight for this job?
Dan, I find the Provia II and 3F handle well this sort of situations, with mixed lights and high contrast. I would recommended to overexpose by 1/2 f-stop for poses of a few seconds (averag e, values on 100 ASA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Whatever
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 4,253
|
Tungsten or daylight for this job?
Why not shoot both and see what looks best?
There is an interesting example of this kind of shot in Simmons' _Using the View Camera_ as a double exposure. The building is shot before sunrise with the lights on and the correct filtration for the indoor light with daylight film, then a second exposure is made, without the filtration, for the exterior of the building after sunrise. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 775
|
Tungsten or daylight for this job?
Negative will definitely give you the most flexibility. Any slight cast that isn't compensated for can easily be corrected, and if the printer knows what they're doing they can even "filter dodge" areas of the image that need extra correction.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tungsten Film for Landscapes | Scott Rosenberg | Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing | 11 | 27-Jan-2005 04:53 |
| tungsten diffusion | tim atherton | Style & Technique | 7 | 19-Mar-2004 15:41 |
| Tungsten lights | David Nash | Style & Technique | 5 | 16-Jun-2000 19:44 |
| Mixing Tungsten and flash | Yaakov Asher Sinclair | Style & Technique | 4 | 20-May-2000 04:55 |
| Tungsten Film for Landscapes? | Gregory Froelich | Darkroom: Film, Processing & Printing | 5 | 21-Dec-1999 03:47 |